Skip to content

[CP Stg] Fix category change log thread header to match the system message - #98495

Merged
roryabraham merged 13 commits into
mainfrom
rory/fix-98482-category-thread-header
Aug 13, 2026
Merged

[CP Stg] Fix category change log thread header to match the system message#98495
roryabraham merged 13 commits into
mainfrom
rory/fix-98482-category-thread-header

Conversation

@roryabraham

@roryabraham roryabraham commented Aug 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Explanation of Change

There are two parallel report-action → text resolvers in the App:

  • the chat system message and the LHN preview go through getWorkspaceCategoryUpdateMessage in src/libs/ReportActionsUtils.ts
  • the thread/report header goes through computeReportNameBasedOnReportAction in src/libs/ReportNameUtils.ts

#97919 added the new updateAreAttendeesRequired copy to the first resolver, but the second has never had a branch for the category change log action types, so it fell through to the raw server-generated text. That's why the chat shows changed the "Advertising" category attendees to required (previously not required) while the thread header shows updated the category "Advertising" by changing the Attendees from Not Required to Required.

This routes more action types through getWorkspaceCategoryUpdateMessage in computeReportNameBasedOnReportAction, mirroring what SidebarUtils.getOptionData's categoryResolver already does with the same action types. Since that resolver falls back to getReportActionText for anything it doesn't recognize, an unhandled updatedField keeps rendering exactly what it renders today.

Second, smaller change. Category description hints are persisted as HTML, so a hint of Client's & partner's names is stored as Client&#x27;s &amp; partner&#x27;s names. getWorkspaceCategoryUpdateMessage use that raw value. The chat happened to hide the entities because ReportActionItemBasicMessage applies Str.htmlDecode when rendering, but it still leaked tags there, and the entities leaked verbatim into the LHN preview and the copy-to-clipboard text. The commentHint branch now runs the values through Parser.htmlToText, which handles both entities and the <br /> a multi-line hint produces.

Two related gaps found while working on this that are deliberately not in this PR:

  1. SidebarUtils calls getWorkspaceCategoryUpdateMessage without the policy argument, so LHN previews for the two receipt-threshold fields can still disagree with the chat and header.
  2. POLICY_CHANGE_LOG.UPDATE_CATEGORIES (plural) is still not routed in ReportNameUtils, so a thread on "updated N categories" keeps showing raw server text.

Fixed Issues

$ #98482
PROPOSAL:

Tests

  1. Open a workspace's settings and enable Rules under More features, upgrading to the Control plan when prompted.
  2. Open Rules and enable Attendee tracking.
  3. Go to Categories, open the Advertising category, and open Require fields.
  4. Enable Require attendees.
  5. Go to #admins and open the workspace change log thread.
  6. Verify the system message reads changed the "Advertising" category attendees to required (previously not required).
  7. Right click that message and select Reply in thread.
  8. Verify the thread header reads changed the "Advertising" category attendees to required (previously not required) — the same copy as the system message, not updated the category "Advertising" by changing the Attendees from Not Required to Required.
  9. Go back to the category's Require fields page and enable Require description.
  10. Reply in thread on the resulting system message and verify the header again matches the system message.
  11. Open the category's Description hint, enter Client's & partner's names, and save.
  12. Reply in thread on the resulting system message and verify both the system message and the thread header read added the description hint "Client's & partner's names" to the category "Advertising" with no &#x27; or &amp; escapes, and that the LHN preview for that thread reads the same.
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

n/a - category change logs come from the server

QA Steps

Same as tests.

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari image image image

The thread header for a POLICY_CHANGE_LOG.UPDATE_CATEGORY action falls back
to the raw server text instead of the copy shown in the chat system message.
…resolver

Thread headers for category add/delete/update/rename actions fell back to the
raw server text, so they disagreed with the system message in the chat.
Moves the HeaderView case below the shared render helper, uses the empty
oldValue the server sends the first time attendees are required, and adds
unit coverage for the four action types and the policy-formatted amounts.
Description hints are stored as HTML, so interpolating them directly leaked
escaped entities into the system message and, now that the thread header
shares the same resolver, into the report name too.
Pins which side of the message the workspace default amount lands on.
@roryabraham
roryabraham marked this pull request as ready for review August 12, 2026 22:00
@roryabraham
roryabraham requested review from a team as code owners August 12, 2026 22:00
@melvin-bot
melvin-bot Bot requested review from nyomanjyotisa and removed request for a team August 12, 2026 22:00
@melvin-bot

melvin-bot Bot commented Aug 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@nyomanjyotisa Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot
melvin-bot Bot requested review from JmillsExpensify and removed request for a team August 12, 2026 22:00
@roryabraham
roryabraham requested review from situchan and removed request for JmillsExpensify and nyomanjyotisa August 12, 2026 22:02
@roryabraham roryabraham changed the title Fix category change log thread header to match the system message [CP Stg] Fix category change log thread header to match the system message Aug 12, 2026
@situchan

situchan commented Aug 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: HybridApp
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: HybridApp
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: HybridApp
Screen.Recording.2026-08-12.at.11.41.47.PM.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2026-08-12.at.11.38.23.PM.mov

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: bcf213dbef

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

isActionOfType(parentReportAction, CONST.REPORT.ACTIONS.TYPE.POLICY_CHANGE_LOG.UPDATE_CATEGORY) ||
isActionOfType(parentReportAction, CONST.REPORT.ACTIONS.TYPE.POLICY_CHANGE_LOG.SET_CATEGORY_NAME)
) {
return getWorkspaceCategoryUpdateMessage(translate, parentReportAction, reportPolicy);

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Recompute category headers when policy defaults change

When this new branch handles an UPDATE_CATEGORY action for maxAmountNoReceipt or maxAmountNoItemizedReceipt, getWorkspaceCategoryUpdateMessage() formats the header from reportPolicy.maxExpenseAmountNoReceipt / maxExpenseAmountNoItemizedReceipt and outputCurrency (see ReportActionsUtils around the receipt-threshold cases). However the derived report-name cache only invalidates policy changes listed in hasPolicyRelevantFieldChanged() in src/libs/actions/OnyxDerived/configs/reportAttributes.ts, and those fields are not included there. If the workspace receipt default or currency changes after this thread title has been cached, the header can keep showing the old/default amount while the chat message recomputes from the latest policy, so please add these policy fields to the report-name invalidation or avoid depending on mutable policy data here.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

not a regression, but probably a legitimate bug we can address in a follow-up.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We can probably DRY this since it's kinda repeated in src/libs/OptionsListUtils/index.ts

@situchan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Let's also fix this place:

Screenshot 2026-08-12 at 11 16 30 PM

@roryabraham

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

on it!

Comment on lines -3043 to +3046
return translate('workspaceActions.updatedDescriptionHint', decodedOptionName, newValue as string | undefined, oldValue as string | undefined);
// Description hints are stored as HTML, so they have to be converted back to plain text to read correctly in a message
const newHint = typeof newValue === 'string' && newValue ? Parser.htmlToText(newValue) : undefined;
const oldHint = typeof oldValue === 'string' && oldValue ? Parser.htmlToText(oldValue) : undefined;
return translate('workspaceActions.updatedDescriptionHint', decodedOptionName, newHint, oldHint);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Category description hints are persisted as HTML, so a hint of Client's & partner's names is stored as Client&#x27;s &amp; partner&#x27;s names.

This seems separate bug.
Do you have repro step? I am not able to reproduce raw html rendering

@situchan situchan Aug 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nvm, I reproduced with markdown input

i.e. <strong>Client</strong> names instead of Client names

@situchan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The root cause seems existing in production but reporting anyway:

Bug: Multiline system message is shown in multiple lines on LHN

Screenshot 2026-08-12 at 11 45 20 PM

The global search list takes its row label from the derived report name, so
it showed the raw server text for the same reason the thread header did.
The search result subtitle is the last message preview, which is resolved
separately from the report name and still shows the raw server text.
The search results list resolves its subtitle here rather than through the
report name, so it still rendered the raw server text.
@roryabraham

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Let's also fix this place:

Fixed:

image

@roryabraham
roryabraham requested a review from situchan August 12, 2026 23:08
@melvin-bot
melvin-bot Bot requested a review from Valforte August 12, 2026 23:11
@melvin-bot

melvin-bot Bot commented Aug 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@Valforte Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

luacmartins
luacmartins previously approved these changes Aug 12, 2026

@luacmartins luacmartins left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

The same four-way action type check had grown to three call sites.
@situchan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

One more place to dry:

} else if (
reportAction?.actionName === CONST.REPORT.ACTIONS.TYPE.POLICY_CHANGE_LOG.ADD_CATEGORY ||
reportAction?.actionName === CONST.REPORT.ACTIONS.TYPE.POLICY_CHANGE_LOG.DELETE_CATEGORY ||
reportAction?.actionName === CONST.REPORT.ACTIONS.TYPE.POLICY_CHANGE_LOG.UPDATE_CATEGORY ||
reportAction?.actionName === CONST.REPORT.ACTIONS.TYPE.POLICY_CHANGE_LOG.SET_CATEGORY_NAME
) {

@roryabraham

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

DRYed and retested:

image

@roryabraham
roryabraham merged commit 96fad2f into main Aug 13, 2026
43 of 44 checks passed
@roryabraham
roryabraham deleted the rory/fix-98482-category-thread-header branch August 13, 2026 00:06
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚧 roryabraham has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

@OSBotify

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

OSBotify pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 13, 2026
…ad-header

[CP Stg] Fix category change log thread header to match the system message

(cherry picked from commit 96fad2f)

(cherry-picked to staging by roryabraham)
@OSBotify OSBotify added the CP Staging marks PRs that have been CP'd to staging label Aug 13, 2026
@OSBotify

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🔁 Filed a Staging retest request for deploy blockers #98482 after this PR was cherry-picked to staging.

@OSBotify

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Cherry-picked to staging by https://github.com/roryabraham in version: 9.4.53-1 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

@MelvinBot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🤖 I reviewed this PR against the help site files under docs/articles. No documentation changes are required, so I have not opened a draft PR.

Why: This is an internal message-rendering consistency fix, not a feature or behavior change:

  • It routes category change-log action types through getWorkspaceCategoryUpdateMessage in computeReportNameBasedOnReportAction so the thread/report header shows the same copy as the chat system message and LHN preview.
  • It runs description-hint values through Parser.htmlToText in ReportActionsUtils.ts so HTML entities (&#x27;, &amp;) and <br /> no longer leak into the message text.

The underlying features these messages describe — expense categories, Require fields / Require attendees, and description hints — are already documented, and none of those articles (Create-expense-categories.md, Workspace-Rules.md) reference the exact wording of workspace change-log system messages. Since this PR only makes that internal copy render consistently and doesn't change how any feature is configured or used, there's nothing on the help site to update.

@roryabraham, no help site PR was created since no documentation changes are required. If you feel a doc update is warranted here, reply with @MelvinBot and let me know what to add.

@OSBotify

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/roryabraham in version: 9.4.53-10 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

Bundle Size Analysis (Sentry):

@OSBotify

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Cherry-picked to staging by https://github.com/roryabraham in version: 9.4.54-0 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

@MelvinBot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🤖 Help site review: no changes required.

I reviewed the changes in this PR against Expensify's help site articles under docs/articles and no documentation updates are needed, so I did not create a draft PR.

Why no docs changes are needed

This PR is a purely internal message-rendering consistency fix. It routes workspace category change-log action types (ADD_CATEGORY, DELETE_CATEGORY, UPDATE_CATEGORY, SET_CATEGORY_NAME) through the same getWorkspaceCategoryUpdateMessage resolver in the thread/report header (ReportNameUtils.computeReportNameBasedOnReportAction) that the chat system message and LHN preview already use, so a category-rule change thread header now matches its chat system message instead of showing raw server text. It also decodes HTML entities in category description hint change-log copy via Parser.htmlToText.

None of this changes how a user configures categories, category rules, attendee tracking, or description hints — it only fixes the wording/consistency of the automatically-generated audit-trail messages shown in chat, thread headers, the LHN preview, and copy-to-clipboard. The help site articles (e.g. Workspace-Rules.md, Adding-Attendees.md) document how to set up and use those features, not the exact text of these change-log system messages, so there is nothing in docs/articles that this behavior contradicts or that needs updating.

@roryabraham, this is just a heads-up — no linked help site PR was created since no documentation changes are required. Let me know if you'd still like a docs update for anything here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CP Staging marks PRs that have been CP'd to staging

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants