Fixed completion search for packages with large list of members#18
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: c4d3167424
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
|
||
| All notable changes to R Console will be documented in this file. | ||
|
|
||
| ## [0.2.9] - 2026-06-19 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Align the release entry with package metadata
This new dated 0.2.9 section makes this look ready to tag as v0.2.9, but package.json and package-lock.json still declare 0.2.8; I checked .github/workflows/release.yml and the publish jobs explicitly fail when GITHUB_REF_NAME is not v + package.version. Tagging this commit as v0.2.9 would therefore build 0.2.8 VSIX artifacts and then fail before publishing, so either bump the package metadata in the same release change or keep this under an unreleased section.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
Fix completion search for packages with large member lists.
Previously, triggering completion at
pkg::showed only the initial static list returned bylanguageserver. For large packages, members outside that initial list could not be found by typing in the Quick Pick window; they only appeared after typing a prefix in the console first, such aspkg::p.This changes package member completion to use a package-only
createQuickPick()path that refreshespkg::/pkg:::results while typing.