Skip to content

Conversation

yuwenma
Copy link
Collaborator

@yuwenma yuwenma commented Oct 13, 2025

BRIEF Change description

Fixes #

WHY do we need this change?

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR add something which needs to be 'release noted'?


  • Reviewer reviewed release note.

Additional documentation e.g., references, usage docs, etc.:


Intended Milestone

Please indicate the intended milestone.

  • Reviewer tagged PR with the actual milestone.

Tests you have done

  • Run make ready-pr to ensure this PR is ready for review.
  • Perform necessary E2E testing for changed resources.

Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please ask for approval from yuwenma. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@yuwenma
Copy link
Collaborator Author

yuwenma commented Oct 13, 2025

/hold
Depends on #5406

@yuwenma
Copy link
Collaborator Author

yuwenma commented Oct 13, 2025

issue #5338

// * `batch-hpc-rocky`: use Batch HPC Rocky Linux images.
// +kcc:proto:field=google.cloud.batch.v1.AllocationPolicy.Disk.image
ImageRef *v1alpha1.ResourceRef `json:"imageRef,omitempty"`
Image *string `json:"image,omitempty"`
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks like an imageRef?

// BatchJobSpec defines the desired state of BatchJob
// +kcc:spec:proto=google.cloud.batch.v1.Job
type BatchJobSpec struct {
ParentRef *parent.ProjectAndLocationRef `json:",inline"`
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nit: (not for this PR) ... I've realized that you probably mean ProjectRefAndLocation (?)


var BatchTaskGVK = GroupVersion.WithKind("BatchTask")

type Parent struct {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nit: Isn't this *parent.ProjectAndLocationRef

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It is. But this PR should only contain code for BatchJob promotion.

[refs] crd=batchjobs.batch.cnrm.cloud.google.com version=v1alpha1: field ".spec.allocationPolicy.serviceAccount" should be a reference
[refs] crd=batchjobs.batch.cnrm.cloud.google.com version=v1beta1: field ".spec.allocationPolicy.instances[].policy.bootDisk.image" should be a reference
[refs] crd=batchjobs.batch.cnrm.cloud.google.com version=v1beta1: field ".spec.allocationPolicy.instances[].policy.disks[].newDisk.image" should be a reference
[refs] crd=batchjobs.batch.cnrm.cloud.google.com version=v1beta1: field ".spec.allocationPolicy.serviceAccount" should be a reference
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, I think this is correct ... both image and serviceAccount should be references?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants