Add have, suff, contr to bossLib and documentation - #2039
Open
myreen wants to merge 4 commits into
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Why add more synonyms? Because these are more descriptive in my opinion.
I find
havemore natural thansg, which is a bit cryptic for newcomers.Why
contr? I don't understand how people can keep writingsuppose_not_then strip_assume_tacevery time they want to prove by contradiction. I have always preferredCCONTR_TAC, but that seems shouty and old style.Why
suff? Well, it's nice and short.I have attempted to update the documentation and release notes.