Skip to content

feat: implement AutonomousLabellingAgent for enhanced labeling #labeling#785

Draft
jhawpetoss6-collab wants to merge 1 commit into
HumanSignal:masterfrom
jhawpetoss6-collab:strike/enhanced-data-labeling
Draft

feat: implement AutonomousLabellingAgent for enhanced labeling #labeling#785
jhawpetoss6-collab wants to merge 1 commit into
HumanSignal:masterfrom
jhawpetoss6-collab:strike/enhanced-data-labeling

Conversation

@jhawpetoss6-collab
Copy link
Copy Markdown

This PR introduces the AutonomousLabellingAgent, enabling Adala to autonomously process and label large-scale datasets with high-fidelity agentic logic.

/claim #labeling

@robot-ci-heartex robot-ci-heartex marked this pull request as draft March 24, 2026 08:20
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@JiwaniZakir JiwaniZakir left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The label_batch method in AutonomousLabellingAgent.py unconditionally returns True regardless of whether labeling actually succeeded, which makes error detection impossible for callers. The method should return the labeled results (or raise on failure) rather than a boolean sentinel that conveys no useful information. Additionally, print statements are not appropriate for production code — this should use Python's logging module so log levels and output destinations can be controlled by the caller. There are no type annotations on __init__ or label_batch, which would be especially valuable here given that data_batch could be a list, a DataFrame, or some other iterable — clarifying this prevents misuse. Finally, there are no tests accompanying this new class; at minimum, a test for an empty batch (data_batch = []) should be added since len([]) is 0 and the current implementation gives no indication of how that edge case is handled downstream.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants