Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Removing unnecessary steps and passing extra arguments for tiled inference #469

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 10, 2025

Conversation

Joao-L-S-Almeida
Copy link
Member

@Joao-L-S-Almeida Joao-L-S-Almeida commented Mar 3, 2025

No description provided.

@Joao-L-S-Almeida Joao-L-S-Almeida changed the title Removing unnecessary steps and passing extra arguments for tiled infe… Removing unnecessary steps and passing extra arguments for tiled inference Mar 3, 2025
@Joao-L-S-Almeida Joao-L-S-Almeida self-assigned this Mar 3, 2025
@Joao-L-S-Almeida Joao-L-S-Almeida added 0.99.9 bug Something isn't working labels Mar 3, 2025
@paolofraccaro
Copy link
Collaborator

Changes look good. Did we add any test for this?

@Joao-L-S-Almeida
Copy link
Member Author

We just have examples inside tests/resources/configs, but no automatic test. I'll add them.

@Joao-L-S-Almeida
Copy link
Member Author

It seems no of our currently tested models really uses this dicttionary rest for extra arguments. Maybe SatMAE or Clay are using it.

@paolofraccaro
Copy link
Collaborator

Are we ready to merge? @Joao-L-S-Almeida @romeokienzler

Copy link
Collaborator

@romeokienzler romeokienzler left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@romeokienzler romeokienzler merged commit ec4d679 into main Mar 10, 2025
7 checks passed
@romeokienzler romeokienzler deleted the avoid/repetition/tiled branch March 10, 2025 11:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
0.99.9 bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants