Skip to content

Add internal planners #67

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Add internal planners #67

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

dannys4
Copy link
Collaborator

@dannys4 dannys4 commented May 6, 2025

Addresses #66

@dannys4 dannys4 requested a review from andreasnoack May 6, 2025 17:27
@dannys4
Copy link
Collaborator Author

dannys4 commented May 6, 2025

looks like the regression test on rfft allocations is failing on pre for some reason. no idea what alloc is changing, but I would guess it has something to do with the function barrier I'm implicitly introducing. Can I just change the regression test? I'm not really sure what I have power over :/

@jtravs
Copy link

jtravs commented May 7, 2025

This looks good. Can we bikeshed the naming?

As this interface is meant to be public (when wanting to avoid AbstractFFTs) I find the __FFTA_plan_fft etc. quite ugly. Given that there is the usual package/module-level namespacing, it seems to me that something like ffta_plan_fft etc. would be sufficient. It is very unlikely that someone in another module would write a function with that name and the same argument types.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants