Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

cargo: add the lock file, this should help sccache #1187

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 14, 2025

Conversation

ahayzen-kdab
Copy link
Collaborator

We have been seeing sccache decide that the caches are not the same one of the causes looks to be, eg the cc crate, updating.

Also there was a change to the Rust policy of not commiting lock files for Rust libraries.

https://blog.rust-lang.org/2023/08/29/committing-lockfiles.html

@ahayzen-kdab ahayzen-kdab force-pushed the add-cargo-lock-file branch 2 times, most recently from fd41942 to 7b6b89e Compare February 14, 2025 10:49
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 14, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (94b9a25) to head (7fcf2a0).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main     #1187   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           73        73           
  Lines        12438     12438           
=========================================
  Hits         12438     12438           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

We have been seeing sccache decide that the caches are not the same
one of the causes looks to be, eg the cc crate, updating.

Also there was a change to the Rust policy of not commiting lock files
for Rust libraries.

https://blog.rust-lang.org/2023/08/29/committing-lockfiles.html
@ahayzen-kdab ahayzen-kdab merged commit 484d265 into KDAB:main Feb 14, 2025
16 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants