forked from kortix-ai/suna
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
selective merge with upstream main #3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
Logrui
wants to merge
170
commits into
dev
Choose a base branch
from
main
base: dev
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
fix the ui in maintenance mode
fix the ui in maintenance mode
admins can bypass maintenance mode
…-test-deletion
…etion Disable test deletion
…loader in dark mode, fix dark mode Kortix Loader; switch to backend API for fetching of threads
fix: optimize cache updates and invalidation for agent updates
ui: incase sandbox is deleted
feat: improve add worker screen
fix free tier payment bug
ensure agent is installed
…sed-enforcements
…cements Plan based enforcements
…cements feat: add limits dropdown at the top
…cements feat: add limits dropdown at the top
…cements Plan based enforcements
Sync with Main
Logrui
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 14, 2025
Added Notes/Comments sections to each problem area: CRITICAL #1 (Tool Exception Swallowing): - Integrate with malformed tool call handler - Needs more research CRITICAL #2 (Error Propagation): - Frontend toast integration needed - System likely exists already HIGH #3 (Race Condition): - Doesn't sound too hard to fix - Need solution options after research HIGH #4 (Dependency Arrays): - SKIP FOR NOW - too complex, requires major rework - Need alternative solutions without architecture refactor MEDIUM #5 (Redis Message Loss): - Not super high priority - Review batching compatibility with Redis MEDIUM #6 (Buffer Overflow): - Frontend bandaid from previous attempt - Either improve + test OR remove for backend-only solution MEDIUM #7 (startTransition): - Critical UX issue - final content must render - Investigate further LOW (Keepalive): - Quick fix, easy win - Low-hanging fruit
Logrui
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 16, 2025
PHASE 0.5 COMPLETION: - Conducted three-phase automated analysis of upstream commits - Analyzed 673 commits across 3 upstream branches (PRODUCTION, native_tool_calling, parallel_tool) - Identified 4 high-priority commits for Week 1 cherry-picking - Discovered 6 of 7 problem areas have production-tested fixes (86% coverage) - Selected Track 1 (PRODUCTION) as baseline due to low risk and production-tested status KEY DISCOVERIES: - Upstream branches are NOT merged into each other (critical finding) - Production-tested solutions exist for streaming failures - Clear escalation path: Track 1 Track 2 Track 3 if needed COMMITS IDENTIFIED FOR WEEK 1: 1. abadd6a - Cancellation event + graceful stoppage (addresses #2, #3) 2. 8b6b16f - 5-second drain timeout (addresses #6) 3. e56c287 - Don't save cancelled responses (addresses #3) 4. 26baa2e - Frontend cleanup and refactoring (addresses #4, #7) DOCUMENTATION UPDATED: - plan.md: Added Phase 1 implementation strategy with step-by-step cherry-pick workflow - Pre-Phase-1-Problem-Areas.md: Added upstream fix information for all 7 problems - research.md: Updated with upstream research findings and decision rationale - upstream-file-diffs-research/research.md: Added 'potential' language for candidate fixes IMPLEMENTATION READY: - Phase 1 cherry-pick workflow documented with git commands - Testing strategy defined (backend + frontend after each commit) - Evaluation criteria established (success/failure/escalation) - Week 2 decision tree prepared based on outcomes EXPECTED OUTCOME: - Week 1: 60-80% of streaming issues potentially resolved - Week 2: Evaluate and cherry-pick additional commits if needed - Week 3+: Escalate to Track 2 or implement from-scratch if Track 1 insufficient This represents a major pivot from 'implement from scratch' to 'cherry-pick production-tested fixes' approach, significantly reducing risk and timeline.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.