dded feature.txt with new feature note

[hamza759]

Changes

• Created a new branch feature-branch
• Added file feature.txt containing "New Feature"

Purpose

• Part of Task 1 (Working with Pull Requests) in DevOps challenge
• Demonstrates creating a branch, making changes, and submitting a PR

Testing

• Verified commit and push to forked repo

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation

  • Updated README with a new header under the community section.
  • Added a “Discover More in Our Detailed Table of Contents” block with a link to the TOC for easier navigation.
  • Improved readability and presentation of the README.

• Chores

  • Added a feature note file indicating a new feature in the feature branch.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Documentation-only update: README.md gains a new H1 line and a TOC-linked content block; a new text file feature.txt is added with a single-line message. No code, APIs, or exports are modified.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary of Changes
Documentation Update README.md	Inserted a new H1 line under “Learn, Upskill, Grow with the Community” and added a “Discover More” block linking to TOC.md.
New Text File feature.txt	Added new file containing a single line announcing a new feature in the feature branch.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Poem

I thump my paws—new lines appear!
A header hops, the TOC draws near.
A tiny feature note—so neat, so bright—
Two little edits, light as night.
In docs we burrow, tidy and keen,
Carrots of clarity, crisp and clean. 🥕

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title Check	✅ Passed	The title succinctly describes the primary change—adding feature.txt with a new feature note—and directly relates to the changeset, so it communicates the main change to reviewers; it is short and specific, though it contains a minor typographical error ("dded" instead of "Added") that does not obscure meaning.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Tip

👮 Agentic pre-merge checks are now available in preview!

Pro plan users can now enable pre-merge checks in their settings to enforce checklists before merging PRs.

• Built-in checks – Quickly apply ready-made checks to enforce title conventions, require pull request descriptions that follow templates, validate linked issues for compliance, and more.
• Custom agentic checks – Define your own rules using CodeRabbit’s advanced agentic capabilities to enforce organization-specific policies and workflows. For example, you can instruct CodeRabbit’s agent to verify that API documentation is updated whenever API schema files are modified in a PR. Note: Upto 5 custom checks are currently allowed during the preview period. Pricing for this feature will be announced in a few weeks.

Please see the documentation for more information.

Example:

reviews:
  pre_merge_checks:
    custom_checks:
      - name: "Undocumented Breaking Changes"
        mode: "warning"
        instructions: |
          Pass/fail criteria: All breaking changes to public APIs, CLI flags, environment variables, configuration keys, database schemas, or HTTP/GraphQL endpoints must be documented in the "Breaking Change" section of the PR description and in CHANGELOG.md. Exclude purely internal or private changes (e.g., code not exported from package entry points or explicitly marked as internal).

Please share your feedback with us on this Discord post.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)

feature.txt (1)

1-1: Fix typos and align with project tone.

Capitalize sentence and correct spelling (“feature”). If the intent is the minimal note per PR description, prefer the concise “New Feature”.

Apply one of these:

-i have included new fature in fature branch
+I have included a new feature in the feature branch.

or (to match the PR objective exactly):

-i have included new fature in fature branch
+New Feature

README.md (1)

4-4: Remove personal H1 from README.

A user-specific statement as an H1 disrupts document structure and project voice. Suggest deleting it.

Apply:

-# I edit this readme using my own SSH account

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4c3f0ea and 78c92e8.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• README.md (1 hunks)
• feature.txt (1 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (1)

feature.txt (1)

1-1: Content mismatch with PR objective.

PR says feature.txt should contain “New Feature”, but the file has a different sentence with typos. Please reconcile (update the file or the PR description).