docs: edited the link to the badges

[Olexandr88]

Proposed change

Your PR description goes here.

Type of change

• New core framework functionality
• Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• Code refactoring without any functionality changes
• New or existing module/payload change
• Documentation/localization improvement
• Test coverage improvement
• Dependency upgrade
• Other improvement (best practice, cleanup, optimization, etc)

Checklist

• I've followed the contributing guidelines
• I've run make pre-commit, it didn't generate any changes
• I've run make test, all tests passed locally

[coderabbitai]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Updated build status and external service links for accuracy.
  • Refreshed social media handle links to current services.
  • Minor formatting adjustments to project information.

Walkthrough

README.md branding links updated: build status badge URL simplified by removing branch query parameter, Twitter handle link redirected from twitter.com to x.com, and GitHub contributors link formatting adjusted. No code changes or exports modified.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
README branding updates README.md	Updated build status badge link URL (removed ?branch=master parameter), redirected Twitter link from twitter.com to x.com, and adjusted GitHub contributors link formatting

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Description Check	❓ Inconclusive	The PR description consists entirely of the repository's contribution template with placeholder text. The "Proposed change" section contains only the unfilled placeholder "Your PR description goes here," no actual description of the changes is provided, and no checkboxes are selected. While the template itself is not off-topic, it contains no substantive information about the changeset—it's too vague and generic to convey any meaningful details about what was changed or why.	The author should replace the placeholder text with a meaningful description of the changes made to the README file, specifically explaining what links were updated, why these changes were necessary, and what the improvements accomplish. Additionally, the appropriate checkbox under "Type of change" (likely "Documentation/localization improvement") should be selected to help clarify the nature of the contribution.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title Check	✅ Passed	The PR title "docs: edited the link to the badges" directly relates to the changeset, which involves updating multiple links in the README.md file (build status badge, Twitter/X handle link, and GitHub contributors link). The title uses the "docs:" prefix appropriately since the changes are documentation-only. While the phrasing could be more specific (plural "links" rather than "link"), the title clearly communicates that this PR involves editing documentation-related badge links, which is the primary focus of the changeset.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8c538fa and c00565d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• README.md (1 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (3)

README.md (3)

3-3: Inconsistency between AI summary and actual code on Build Status badge URL.

The AI-generated summary states the query parameter ?branch=master was removed from the Build Status badge URL, but the code still contains this parameter. Clarify whether this parameter should be present or if the summary misrepresents the change.

If the parameter should be removed for simplicity, apply this diff:

-[![Build Status](https://github.com/OWASP/Nettacker/actions/workflows/ci_cd.yml/badge.svg?branch=master)](https://github.com/OWASP/Nettacker/actions/workflows/ci_cd.yml)
+[![Build Status](https://github.com/OWASP/Nettacker/actions/workflows/ci_cd.yml/badge.svg)](https://github.com/OWASP/Nettacker/actions/workflows/ci_cd.yml)

---

5-5: Twitter to X domain update is appropriate.

The badge link has been correctly updated to reflect Twitter's rebranding to X. The change from twitter.com/iotscan to x.com/iotscan aligns with current platform conventions.

---

6-6: GitHub contributors badge link is correct.

The GitHub contributors badge and link to /graphs/contributors are properly formatted and functional.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}