Skip to content

🌟 [Major]: Introducing Get-PesterCodeCoverage #1

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 75 commits into from
Apr 17, 2025
Merged

🌟 [Major]: Introducing Get-PesterCodeCoverage #1

merged 75 commits into from
Apr 17, 2025

Conversation

MariusStorhaug
Copy link
Member

@MariusStorhaug MariusStorhaug commented Mar 13, 2025

Description

This pull request introduces the Get-PesterCodeCoverage GitHub Action that aggregates Pester code coverage reports and generates a detailed summary with coverage statistics.

Core functionality

  • scripts/main.ps1: Added functionality to aggregate Pester code coverage reports, normalize file paths, and compute aggregate coverage statistics. The action now enforces a coverage threshold and generates detailed GitHub step summaries with expandable sections for missed and executed commands.

Tests

  • .github/workflows/Action-Test.yml: Updated the Action-Test.yml workflow to upload multiple code coverage artifacts for macOS and Windows environments and added new parameters (StepSummary_Mode and CodeCoveragePercentTarget) to control reporting behavior.
  • tests/*: Added tests reports to use for the Action-Test workflow.

Documentation

  • README.md: Updated README to reflect the new functionality, including detailed usage instructions, input descriptions, and example workflows. Added a comprehensive explanation of outputs and behavior.

Action Metadata

  • action.yml: Updated to align with the new functionality. Added new inputs (StepSummary_Mode, CodeCoveragePercentTarget) for customization.

Type of change

  • 📖 [Docs]
  • 🪲 [Fix]
  • 🩹 [Patch]
  • ⚠️ [Security fix]
  • 🚀 [Feature]
  • 🌟 [Breaking change]

Checklist

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas

…consistency; update references in main.ps1 and improve output formatting in coverage logs.
…executed commands, enhancing readability and structure in GitHub step summary.
…uted commands, improving formatting and readability
…nhancing readability in missed and executed commands
…to use markdown code fences for improved readability
…d replace new lines with line breaks for improved readability
…-breaking spaces, enhancing readability in displayed commands
@Copilot Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings March 13, 2025 12:07
Copy link

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR updates the GitHub Action configuration and the associated workflow. The changes include updating action metadata in action.yml (action name, description, and inputs) and modifying the Auto-Release workflow by removing the explicit GITHUB_TOKEN environment variable.

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 16 out of 16 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

File Description
action.yml Updated action name/description and modified default input values.
.github/workflows/Auto-Release.yml Removed the GITHUB_TOKEN environment variable in the release job step.
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (2)

action.yml:27

  • Changing the default WorkingDirectory from '${{ github.workspace }}' to '.' may cause path resolution issues if the action expects an absolute path. Please confirm that this change is intended and functions as expected in different repository contexts.
default: '.'

.github/workflows/Auto-Release.yml:32

  • Removing the GITHUB_TOKEN environment variable may cause the Auto-Release action to fail if the token is required for authentication. Please verify that this removal is intentional and that the workflow has alternative means to access the necessary permissions.
env:
  GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ github.token }}

@MariusStorhaug MariusStorhaug changed the title V1 v1 Apr 11, 2025
- Created a new code coverage report XML file for the PSModuleTest module.
- The report includes detailed coverage metrics for various methods and classes within the module.
- Coverage statistics indicate missed instructions, lines, and methods, highlighting areas for potential improvement.
@MariusStorhaug MariusStorhaug changed the title v1 🌟 [Major]: Introducing Get-PesterCodeCoverage Apr 17, 2025
@MariusStorhaug MariusStorhaug self-assigned this Apr 17, 2025
@MariusStorhaug MariusStorhaug requested a review from Copilot April 17, 2025 10:34
Copy link

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot reviewed 15 out of 19 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

Files not reviewed (4)
  • scripts/Helpers.psm1: Language not supported
  • scripts/main.ps1: Language not supported
  • tests/CodeCoverage/Module-Windows-CodeCoverage/Module-Windows-CodeCoverage-Report.json: Language not supported
  • tests/CodeCoverage/Module-macOS-CodeCoverage/Module-macOS-CodeCoverage-Report.json: Language not supported
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (3)

action.yml:28

  • The default value for StepSummary_Mode is defined as 'Missed, Files' here but is documented as 'Missed,Files' in README.md. Please ensure the default value is consistent between the action definition and documentation.
StepSummary_Mode:

.github/workflows/Action-Test.yml:80

  • The previous configuration included a working-directory setting, which has now been removed. Verify that this change is intentional and that the action is expected to run from the intended directory context.
StepSummary_Mode: Full

.github/workflows/Auto-Release.yml:31

  • The removal of the GITHUB_TOKEN environment variable from the Auto-Release step might affect authentication. Confirm that the Auto-Release action now handles token management internally or that this change is intentional.
uses: PSModule/Auto-Release@v1

@MariusStorhaug MariusStorhaug requested a review from Copilot April 17, 2025 10:42
Copy link

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR introduces the Get-PesterCodeCoverage GitHub Action that aggregates Pester code coverage reports, enforces coverage thresholds, and produces detailed summaries.

  • Adds new inputs and updates action configuration in action.yml
  • Revises workflow files (Action-Test.yml and Auto-Release.yml) to support multi-platform code coverage uploads and trigger behaviors
  • Updates documentation (README.md) and removes placeholder test files

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 15 out of 19 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

Show a summary per file
File Description
tests/README.md Removed placeholder content for tests
action.yml Updated configuration with new inputs and GitHub Action settings
README.md Enhanced documentation reflecting new functionality and usage details
.github/workflows/Auto-Release.yml Removed GITHUB_TOKEN env variable; verify its necessity
.github/workflows/Action-Test.yml Added artifact upload steps and updated inputs for improved testing
Files not reviewed (4)
  • scripts/Helpers.psm1: Language not supported
  • scripts/main.ps1: Language not supported
  • tests/CodeCoverage/Module-Windows-CodeCoverage/Module-Windows-CodeCoverage-Report.json: Language not supported
  • tests/CodeCoverage/Module-macOS-CodeCoverage/Module-macOS-CodeCoverage-Report.json: Language not supported
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

.github/workflows/Auto-Release.yml:31

  • The removal of the GITHUB_TOKEN environment variable might affect authentication for auto-release; please verify that this change is intentional and that the release process still functions correctly.
-        env:

@MariusStorhaug MariusStorhaug merged commit fbe22e8 into main Apr 17, 2025
14 checks passed
@MariusStorhaug MariusStorhaug deleted the v1 branch April 17, 2025 10:44
MariusStorhaug added a commit to PSModule/Process-PSModule that referenced this pull request Apr 19, 2025
…zation (#150)

The **PSModule v4 release** is a major overhaul of the PowerShell module
workflow, introducing significant architectural changes to improve
speed, modularity, and maintainability. This update continues on the
goal to split the once-monolithic process into distinct GitHub Actions
for building, testing, documenting, and publishing modules. By
refactoring the workflow into isolated steps and enabling parallel
execution, v4 dramatically optimizes build and test times while ensuring
a more reliable and customizable process for module developers.


![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a583c4bd-e8ea-45dc-9164-a254f4764fa5)

<details><summary>Diagram - Old version</summary>
<p>


![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/679bc459-44cd-4f50-8a98-e70bb4977068)

</p>
</details>

## Features

### Parallel Testing & Results Aggregation

The workflow has been reworked to support flexible, parallelizable test
runs. The `Test-PSModule` action will now execute tests in parallel via
matrix jobs (e.g. across multiple OSes or test stages). Separate helper
actions (`Get-PesterTestResults` and `Get-PesterCodeCoverage`) have been
introduced to aggregate Pester test outcomes and code coverage from
those parallel jobs, providing unified reporting and enforcing test
success and coverage thresholds across the matrix.

- Fixes #78
- Fixes #119

### Central Configuration File

A new configuration hierarchy allows customizing the process through a
YAML (JSON or PSD1) settings file. Users can include a
`.github/PSModule.yml` in their module repo to override defaults. This
centralized config makes the pipeline more flexible and eliminates the
need for hard-coded inputs in workflow files.

- Fixes #144
- Fixes #81
- Fixes #159

### Dedicated Documentation Step

Documentation generation is now handled by a new `Document-PSModule`
action. This step automatically builds the module's documentation (using
PlatyPS) and uploads as an artifact, so that other steps can build a
site and publish it to GitHub Pages. By isolating documentation in its
own action, v4 ensures that doc-specific tools (e.g. PlatyPS and MkDocs)
run without interference from build or test modules, and documentation
is kept up-to-date with each release.

- Fixes #148
- Fixes #77
- Fixes #95

### Shared Helper Module Action

A new `Install-PSModuleHelpers` action has been introduced as a
foundational setup step. It installs and configures common helper
functions used by the pipeline (for example, version specification
conversion, module dependency resolution, and module installation
utilities). This ensures all subsequent actions operate with a
consistent environment and shared logic. Common functionality like
resolving module dependencies (`Resolve-PSModuleDependency`) and version
parsing has been consolidated here, reducing duplication across the
build/test/publish steps.

### Enhanced Platform and Compatibility Support

The v4 workflow expands support and testing across platforms and
PowerShell versions. The Test-PSModule action runs on Windows, Linux,
and macOS with PowerShell Core (and includes light support for Windows
PowerShell 5.1 for basic compatibility).

- Fixes #146

### New test actions

Static analysis is performed via a dedicated `Invoke-ScriptAnalyzer`
GitHub action, and Pester tests are executed in an isolated context via
the `Invoke-Pester` GitHub action, ensuring consistent behavior across
different environments and increases the reusability of the automation
we built around Pester. The new design also honors repository-specific
analyzer settings (automatically picking up settings from
`.github/linters/.powershell-psscriptanalyzer.psd1` in the repo for
static code analysis), allowing module developers to customize linting
rules.

- Fixes #108
- Fixes #130

### Modular Workflows

By splitting the CI/CD process into discrete actions and enabling
concurrency, the overall pipeline runtime is greatly reduced. Linting,
unit tests, and integration tests can run in parallel, and the build
step no longer blocks documentation or analysis. This *time-optimized
process* means quicker feedback on pull requests and faster delivery of
new module releases.

### Simplified Build & Publish Process

The `Build-PSModule` action has been refactored into a pure module
builder. New inputs like `ArtifactName` and `WorkingDirectory` give more
control over build output naming and source path. The build step now
produces a clean module package and uploads it as an artifact called
`module`. Likewise, the **Publish-PSModule** action has been bumped to
v2 with a clearer interface – it removes the old monolithic
`ConfigurationFile` input in favor of explicit inputs and the new
central settings file. The publish logic now uses the repository’s
context (working directory defaulting to `.`) and respects the unified
settings, simplifying how modules are published to the PowerShell
Gallery.

### Robust Dependency Handling

Module dependency resolution during builds is now more reliable and
up-to-date. The pipeline switched to using **PSResourceGet** for
installing required module dependencies, replacing the legacy
PowerShellGet v2 approach. This change ensures compatibility with the
latest PowerShell module packaging standards and improves the speed and
success of acquiring dependencies. The helper scripts
(`Convert-VersionSpec` and `Resolve-PSModuleDependency`) were moved into
the shared helpers module, and their logic was hardened with better
retry and null-check mechanisms when querying the PowerShell Gallery.

- Fixes #62

### Better Logging and Diagnostics

Each action now provides more transparent logging and output for easier
troubleshooting. The Publish step, for example, now logs all input
parameters at the start of execution for traceability. Verbose logging
in dependency resolution has been replaced with clear console output to
ensure important information is always visible. The
`Get-PesterTestResults` action prints a detailed summary of test suites
executed, including counts of passed/failed/skipped tests, and will mark
the workflow as failed if any tests did not run or failed – giving
immediate feedback if something went wrong in the parallel test jobs.

- Fixes #91

### Other smaller issues

- Fixes #82

## Related actions and PRs

-
[Install-PSModuleHelpers](https://github.com/PSModule/Install-PSModuleHelpers)
| PSModule/Install-PSModuleHelpers#2
- [Test-PSModule](https://github.com/PSModule/Test-PSModule) |
PSModule/Test-PSModule#98
-
[Get-PesterTestResults](https://github.com/PSModule/Get-PesterTestResults)
| PSModule/Get-PesterTestResults#2
-
[Get-PesterCodeCoverage](https://github.com/PSModule/Get-PesterCodeCoverage)
| PSModule/Get-PesterCodeCoverage#1
- [Invoke-Pester](https://github.com/PSModule/Invoke-Pester)
-
[Invoke-ScriptAnalyzer](https://github.com/PSModule/Invoke-ScriptAnalyzer)
- [Document-PSModule](https://github.com/PSModule/Document-PSModule) |
PSModule/Document-PSModule#16
- [Build-PSModule](https://github.com/PSModule/Build-PSModule) |
PSModule/Build-PSModule#108
- [Publish-PSModule](https://github.com/PSModule/Publish-PSModule) |
PSModule/Publish-PSModule#49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant