Disable physics during configuration packet

[bmstefanski]

I've found that connecting to a server with minecraft version 1.20.4 didn't work - throwing quite ambiguous error An internal error occurred in your connection, but after trying different things for a while I figured it works well on 1.20 and only some servers throw that error. I compared the packet trace between those two versions and one difference I found was that in 1.20.4, servers send start_configuration packets during gameplay to reconfigure clients, but mineflayer's physics plugin was missing handlers for this. The bot continued sending position packets while in configuration state, which is invalid and causes the server to kick the client

[Omena0]

LGTM

[rom1504]

Tests fail

I think we should rather disable a lot more than specifically physics during configuration phases

And it would be best to add a test for this (probably an internal test), so it will keep working

[Omena0]

Tests fail

I think we should rather disable a lot more than specifically physics during configuration phases

And it would be best to add a test for this (probably an internal test), so it will keep working

Those seem like flaky tests to me.

They don't have anything to do with this pr

[tcortega]

Could this be merged?

[rom1504]

No please see my previous message on what still needs to be done here

[tcortega]

No please see my previous message on what still needs to be done here

The tests that failed did not seem related at all to the PR, as Omena0 said above.

[tcortega]

No please see my previous message on what still needs to be done here

Could you please try re-running the tests that failed?

[rom1504]

I think we should rather disable a lot more than specifically physics during configuration phases

And it would be best to add a test for this (probably an internal test), so it will keep working

This is the main point

[tcortega]

I think we should rather disable a lot more than specifically physics during configuration phases

And it would be best to add a test for this (probably an internal test), so it will keep working

This is the main point

Yeah, I get that's the main point, but this PR shouldn't be blocked for it. This solves a real issue that's affecting me and other users right now.

If more things should be disabled, we can make a separate, more detailed issue for that. We shouldn't hold up this fix expecting the author to do it all here.