-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 35
CAFMaker Truth Bugfix #623
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
trigger build LArSoft/lar*@LARSOFT_SUITE_v10_14_02 SBNSoftware/sbndcode@v10_14_02 SBNSoftware/sbn*@SBN_SUITE_v10_14_02 |
|
✔️ CI build for LArSoft Succeeded on slf7 for c14:prof -- details available through the CI dashboard |
|
✔️ CI build for LArSoft Succeeded on slf7 for e26:prof -- details available through the CI dashboard |
|
❌ CI build for SBND Failed at phase build SBND on slf7 for c14:prof -- details available through the CI dashboard 🚨 For more details about the failed phase, check the build SBND phase logs parent CI build details are available through the CI dashboard |
|
❌ CI build for ICARUS Failed at phase build ICARUS on slf7 for c14:prof -- details available through the CI dashboard 🚨 For more details about the failed phase, check the build ICARUS phase logs parent CI build details are available through the CI dashboard |
|
🚨 For more details about the warning phase, check the ci_tests SBND phase logs parent CI build details are available through the CI dashboard |
|
❌ CI build for ICARUS Failed at phase ci_tests ICARUS on slf7 for e26:prof - ignored warnings for build -- details available through the CI dashboard 🚨 For more details about the failed phase, check the ci_tests ICARUS phase logs parent CI build details are available through the CI dashboard |
|
🚨 For more details about the warning phase, check the ci_tests SBND phase logs parent CI build details are available through the CI dashboard |
|
trigger build LArSoft/lar*@LARSOFT_SUITE_v10_14_02 SBNSoftware/sbndcode@v10_14_02 SBNSoftware/sbn*@SBN_SUITE_v10_14_02 |
|
✔️ CI build for LArSoft Succeeded on slf7 for e26:prof -- details available through the CI dashboard |
|
✔️ CI build for LArSoft Succeeded on slf7 for c14:prof -- details available through the CI dashboard |
|
❌ CI build for SBND Failed at phase build SBND on slf7 for c14:prof -- details available through the CI dashboard 🚨 For more details about the failed phase, check the build SBND phase logs parent CI build details are available through the CI dashboard |
|
❌ CI build for ICARUS Failed at phase build ICARUS on slf7 for c14:prof -- details available through the CI dashboard 🚨 For more details about the failed phase, check the build ICARUS phase logs parent CI build details are available through the CI dashboard |
|
❌ CI build for ICARUS Failed at phase ci_tests ICARUS on slf7 for e26:prof - ignored warnings for build -- details available through the CI dashboard 🚨 For more details about the failed phase, check the ci_tests ICARUS phase logs parent CI build details are available through the CI dashboard |
|
🚨 For more details about the warning phase, check the ci_tests SBND phase logs parent CI build details are available through the CI dashboard |
PetrilloAtWork
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Having proven a point, the PR is approved.
|
|
||
| // Set the cryostat of the position | ||
| for (int icryo = 0; icryo < 2; icryo++) { | ||
| for (int icryo = 0; icryo < (int)active_volumes.size(); icryo++) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Technically it would be more correct to have icryo of index type (std::size_t) since its name suggest it being an index, and then converted in the assignment on line 604.
But I will let it pass; it's mostly to prove that I can make a comment also to a one-liner.
The CI was picking up on some non-deterministic behavior at CAF level. It turns out we had some loops which were hardcoded to values which were not appropriate for SBND. This should resolve some of them (there may be more).