-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 261
[RFC] Add functional guesses #4839
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
AayushSabharwal
merged 10 commits into
SciML:master
from
SebastianM-C:smc/functional_guesses
Aug 9, 2026
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
8ab2a3c
Add initial_trajectory support for function-valued start values
SebastianM-C 0e35281
Add tests for function-valued initial trajectories
SebastianM-C 61fbbc0
Add CasADi backend support for initial_trajectory
SebastianM-C 3dff39f
Document function-valued initial trajectories
SebastianM-C 37b05e7
Accept symbolic expressions for initial_trajectory
SebastianM-C df9cfcc
Test expression-valued initial trajectories
SebastianM-C f0f1567
Document expression-valued initial trajectories
SebastianM-C 5be3f9e
Compile initial trajectories with build_function_wrapper
SebastianM-C 1b0fea1
Update initial trajectory tests for f(p, t) codegen
SebastianM-C 68a4281
Document symbolic-only initial trajectories
SebastianM-C File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Won't this cause problems with
remake? Or initialization, which re-createspas a copy.Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm... I don't think we run initialization on the dynamic optimization path, I'll have to double check. On
remakeI'm not sure how to handle it... The issue is that the backends need only a function of t, but we want to be able to use the (MTK) parameters in the functions. I don't think that we can easily remake, since almost everything else on this path has the same problem of baking the p in, as we need to substitute in the backend specific parameter representation. Probably remake needs to go through the process_ function again and we don't have a fast path remake possible for external backends, that would need to remake the underlying backend specific problem...There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, right, that makes sense