-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
Re-test enzyme #53
Re-test enzyme #53
Conversation
|
@Vaibhavdixit02 can you open an issue with a MWE of the error. I'll try to get it quickly thereafter. |
|
@Vaibhavdixit02 @ChrisRackauckas do you have a MWE (I didn't see one by chance). I'll try to get it fixed quickly |
|
I literally mentioned this to Chris like 2 hours ago haha, we are on the same page. Would you be able to help review the sparse support here? I started the effort in the previous home for this code https://github.com/SciML/Optimization.jl/pull/688/files I'll revive that |
|
Ref MWE let's see if the latest release still throws the same error first |
|
This is now blocking SciML/SciMLSensitivity.jl#1067 |
|
again, happy to help but need a MWE. In interim just going to be plugging away at mixed activity stuff. |
|
bumping this |
|
I have been trying to recreate but ended up with a duplicated returns not handled error instead of the one on CI here - when running OptimizationBase.jl/ext/OptimizationEnzymeExt.jl Lines 368 to 377 in 581f4f8
f2 is incorrect but have been unable to pin down the exact issue yet (I am still trying)
|
|
That implies type inference fails. Assuming the return is a float, that should likely be changed to the following to explicitly specify that the return is active (if type inference fails) |
Checklist
contributor guidelines, in particular the SciML Style Guide and
COLPRAC.
Additional context
Add any other context about the problem here.