Skip to content

Conversation

@rohanmishr
Copy link
Member

Add functionality for an indexer motor that spins when a beam break sensor detects a game piece being indexed.

@rohanmishr rohanmishr self-assigned this Feb 7, 2026
@rohanmishr rohanmishr requested a review from a team February 7, 2026 15:49
@rohanmishr rohanmishr linked an issue Feb 7, 2026 that may be closed by this pull request
@NathanEdg
Copy link
Member

Build errors will be fixed when #16 is merged, then pulled into this branch. @bjmcternan if you are able to approve #16 then this can get merged

@bjmcternan
Copy link
Contributor

Build errors will be fixed when #16 is merged, then pulled into this branch. @bjmcternan if you are able to approve #16 then this can get merged

OK Let's merge #16 first then. We do not want to merge code that cannot be built and run

Copy link
Contributor

@bjmcternan bjmcternan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's add some comments

@NathanEdg
Copy link
Member

#16 was merged into this branch to allow for current to build. When #16 is merged to develop, this should also be able to be merged.

@afranchuk
Copy link

afranchuk commented Feb 9, 2026

As a means of making the PR a bit easier to read, you can (temporarily) make the PR target 9-fix-async-logger-library, so that github will only show the new commits that are intended for this PR. You just need to change it back after that branch is closed. Though I see that there's a merge commit with that branch here... it would be better to rebase this branch onto that one rather than merging back and forth, which better reflects what we want the final commit state to be.

@rohanmishr rohanmishr requested review from a team February 11, 2026 17:47
Copy link
Member

@NathanEdg NathanEdg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good. I don't think we need to comment every instance of "rps", as its a known unit

@NathanEdg
Copy link
Member

#9 is merged

@NathanEdg NathanEdg requested a review from bjmcternan February 11, 2026 18:00
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
{
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why are there updates to path planner?

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This needs to be rebased, that is from a commit from #9.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Indexer Initial Code

5 participants