Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update binary_sensor.py #64

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 12, 2025
Merged

Update binary_sensor.py #64

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 12, 2025

Conversation

UnoSite
Copy link
Owner

@UnoSite UnoSite commented Mar 12, 2025

No description provided.

@UnoSite UnoSite added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation patch Bump patch version number labels Mar 12, 2025
@pull-request-size pull-request-size bot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines label Mar 12, 2025
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ class IsItPaydaySensor(CoordinatorEntity, BinarySensorEntity):
def __init__(self, coordinator: DataUpdateCoordinator, entry_id: str, instance_name: str):
super().__init__(coordinator)
self._attr_unique_id = f"{entry_id}_is_it_payday"
self._attr_name = f"{instance_name} - Is It Payday"
self._attr_name = f"{instance_name} Is It Payday"
self._instance_name = instance_name
self._entry_id = entry_id

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The code patch provided seems to be straightforward. Here are a few points to consider for your code review:

  1. String Formatting Improvement:

    • The change from f"{instance_name} - Is It Payday" to f"{instance_name} Is It Payday" looks fine if there is no specific requirement for having the dash (-) in the name. If the dash is meant to be a separator, the new version without the dash may read slightly differently.
  2. Consistency Check:

    • Ensure consistency in naming conventions throughout the codebase.
    • Check if there is consistent usage of naming conventions with/without separators (like dash) in other parts of the code or related entities.

Overall, the code seems simple and the change made in this patch appears acceptable as long as it aligns with the naming conventions and requirements of the larger codebase or project.

@UnoSite UnoSite merged commit ac595c8 into main Mar 12, 2025
10 checks passed
@UnoSite UnoSite deleted the UnoSite-patch-1 branch March 12, 2025 18:52
Repository owner locked and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 20, 2025
@UnoSite UnoSite added the LOCKED This thread is locked label Mar 20, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation LOCKED This thread is locked patch Bump patch version number size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant