Skip to content

Conversation

@Ulatex1905
Copy link

@Ulatex1905 Ulatex1905 commented Aug 29, 2025

📝 Description

The file src/types/auth.types.ts still contains a LegacyUser function/type definition that is no longer used in the codebase.
This creates unnecessary confusion and technical debt in the authentication type system.

✅ What is expected

Completely remove the LegacyUser function/type from auth.types.ts.

Ensure no other modules, services, or tests import or reference LegacyUser.

Keep the file focused only on the types currently in use for authentication (JWT payload, session types, etc.).

🔧 What was modified

Code Cleanup

Deleted LegacyUser function/type from src/types/auth.types.ts.

References

Performed a project-wide search for LegacyUser.

Removed any leftover imports or usage across modules.

Tests

Ensured no tests were referencing LegacyUser.

Ran the full test suite → ✅ all passing.

Documentation

Removed references to LegacyUser in docs or comments.

🎯 Acceptance Criteria

src/types/auth.types.ts contains no LegacyUser function/type.

No other code references LegacyUser.

All tests pass successfully.

Documentation and comments remain aligned with the current type system.

🔄 Rollback Plan

If removal causes issues in unexpected areas, revert to the previous commit and re-evaluate where LegacyUser might still be required.

As a fallback, comment the type instead of deleting it to confirm unused status.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • No user-facing changes in this release.
  • Refactor
    • Cleaned up deprecated legacy authentication type support to streamline the codebase.
  • Chores
    • Removed outdated compatibility layers related to older authentication structures.
    • Confirmed no impact on current authentication flows; existing sessions and requests continue to work as before.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 29, 2025

Walkthrough

Removed deprecated LegacyUser interface and toLegacyUser helper from src/types/auth.types.ts. Other exported types and Express Request augmentation remain unchanged.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Auth types cleanup
src/types/auth.types.ts
Removed LegacyUser interface and toLegacyUser function. No changes to AuthenticatedUser, AuthenticatedRequest, DecodedUser, isAuthenticatedUser, toAuthenticatedUser, or Express Request augmentation.

Sequence Diagram(s)

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Possibly related issues

Poem

A rabbit tidies code with glee,
Old types hop out, now legacy-free.
Fewer footprints in the snow,
Cleaner paths where futures go.
Thump-thump—tests still pass, you see! 🐇✨

Tip

🔌 Remote MCP (Model Context Protocol) integration is now available!

Pro plan users can now connect to remote MCP servers from the Integrations page. Connect with popular remote MCPs such as Notion and Linear to add more context to your reviews and chats.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

💡 Knowledge Base configuration:

  • MCP integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 23a1f32 and a3db2b2.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/types/auth.types.ts (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • src/types/auth.types.ts
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)

Type @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore or @coderabbit ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Status, Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Status Page to check the current availability of CodeRabbit.
  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant