Skip to content

Conversation

@LuisManu5825
Copy link

@LuisManu5825 LuisManu5825 commented Sep 4, 2025

🚀 Volunchain Pull Request

Mark with an x all the checkboxes that apply (like [x])

  • Closes #
  • Added tests (if necessary)
  • Run tests
  • Run formatting
  • Evidence attached
  • Commented the code

📌 Type of Change

  • Documentation (updates to README, docs, or comments)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Enhancement (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

📝 Changes description

Create and implement repository files

⏰ Time spent breakdown

  • 3 hours: Fix bugs and testing
  • 1 hours: Create repository files and organize layers

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor

    • Reorganized internal NFT module imports for clearer structure and consistency.
    • No changes to public APIs or user-facing behavior.
  • Chores

    • Updated internal references to align with the new module layout.
    • Improves maintainability without affecting functionality.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 4, 2025

Walkthrough

Updates import paths across NFT module files to point to relocated interfaces/entities under application/domain directories. No code logic or public API signatures are changed.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary of Changes
Repository interface import path
src/modules/nft/application/repositories/INFTRepository.ts
Adjusted imports from ../domain/... to ../../domain/...; interface and method signatures unchanged.
Infrastructure repository import path
src/modules/nft/infrastructure/nft.repository.ts
Updated NFT import from ../domain/entities/nft.entity to ../../domain/entities/nft.entity; no logic changes.
Use-case imports relocation
src/modules/nft/use-cases/createNFT.ts, src/modules/nft/use-cases/deleteNFT.ts, src/modules/nft/use-cases/getNFT.ts, src/modules/nft/use-cases/getNFTByUserId.ts
Switched INFTRepository import from ../repositories/INFTRepository to ../application/repositories/INFTRepository; class APIs and behavior unchanged.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

Poem

I hop through paths, refactors neat,
From burrow A to B—no changed beat.
Imports aligned, the trails now clear,
Same carrots fetched, same fields appear.
With tidy routes my whiskers twitch—
A happy merge, no logic switch. 🥕🐇

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)

Type @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore or @coderabbit ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Status, Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Status Page to check the current availability of CodeRabbit.
  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Caution

Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.

⚠️ Outside diff range comments (4)
src/modules/nft/infrastructure/nft.repository.ts (4)

18-26: Method signature mismatch with interface (create should accept INFT).

Class claims to implement INFTRepository, but create(nft: NFT) violates the contract create(nft: INFT). This will not type-check.

-  async create(nft: NFT): Promise<NFT> {
-    const newNFT = (await this.prisma.nFT.create({
+  async create(nft: INFT): Promise<NFT> {
+    const newNFT = await this.prisma.nFT.create({
       data: {
         userId: nft.userId,
         organizationId: nft.organizationId,
         description: nft.description,
-      },
-    })) as unknown as PrismaNFT;
+      },
+      select: {
+        id: true,
+        userId: true,
+        organizationId: true,
+        description: true,
+        createdAt: true,
+      },
+    });

5-13: Avoid local Prisma model re-definition and unsafe casts.

Duplicating Prisma types via PrismaNFT + casting with as unknown as risks drift and defeats type safety. Use Prisma’s generated types or SELECT what you need.

Option A (preferred): keep SELECTs as in the create/find/update diffs and drop PrismaNFT entirely.

-interface PrismaNFT {
-  id: string;
-  createdAt: Date;
-  updatedAt: Date;
-  userId: string;
-  organizationId: string;
-  description: string;
-}
+// rely on Prisma SELECT return types (no local duplication)

36-49: Use SELECT and remove unsafe cast in findById.

Improves type-safety and reduces over-fetching.

-    const nft = (await this.prisma.nFT.findUnique({
-      where: { id },
-    })) as unknown as PrismaNFT | null;
+    const nft = await this.prisma.nFT.findUnique({
+      where: { id },
+      select: {
+        id: true,
+        userId: true,
+        organizationId: true,
+        description: true,
+        createdAt: true,
+      },
+    });

83-95: Whitelist updateable fields; don’t pass domain object directly to Prisma.

Passing Partial as data risks attempting to write read-only/unknown fields (e.g., id, createdAt) and breaks type-safety.

-  async update(id: string, nft: Partial<NFT>): Promise<NFT> {
-    const updatedNFT = (await this.prisma.nFT.update({
-      where: { id },
-      data: nft,
-    })) as unknown as PrismaNFT;
+  async update(id: string, nft: Partial<NFT>): Promise<NFT> {
+    const updatedNFT = await this.prisma.nFT.update({
+      where: { id },
+      data: {
+        ...(nft.userId !== undefined ? { userId: nft.userId } : {}),
+        ...(nft.organizationId !== undefined ? { organizationId: nft.organizationId } : {}),
+        ...(nft.description !== undefined ? { description: nft.description } : {}),
+      },
+      select: {
+        id: true,
+        userId: true,
+        organizationId: true,
+        description: true,
+        createdAt: true,
+      },
+    });
🧹 Nitpick comments (9)
src/modules/nft/infrastructure/nft.repository.ts (2)

51-66: Add input validation for pagination and use SELECT; remove cast.

Prevent negative skip/zero pageSize and avoid fetching unnecessary columns.

-  ): Promise<{ nfts: NFT[]; total: number }> {
-    const skip = (page - 1) * pageSize;
+  ): Promise<{ nfts: NFT[]; total: number }> {
+    const safePage = Math.max(1, Math.floor(page || 1));
+    const safePageSize = Math.max(1, Math.min(100, Math.floor(pageSize || 10)));
+    const skip = (safePage - 1) * safePageSize;
@@
-      this.prisma.nFT.findMany({
+      this.prisma.nFT.findMany({
         where: { userId },
         skip,
-        take: pageSize,
+        take: safePageSize,
         orderBy: { createdAt: "desc" },
+        select: {
+          id: true,
+          userId: true,
+          organizationId: true,
+          description: true,
+          createdAt: true,
+        },
       }),
@@
-      nfts: (nfts as unknown as PrismaNFT[]).map(
+      nfts: nfts.map(

Also applies to: 68-80


15-16: Prefer DI for PrismaClient to avoid excess connections.

Instantiate PrismaClient once (or inject per-request scope) instead of per-repository field.

-export class NFTRepository implements INFTRepository {
-  private prisma = new PrismaClient();
+export class NFTRepository implements INFTRepository {
+  constructor(private readonly prisma: PrismaClient = new PrismaClient()) {}
src/modules/nft/application/repositories/INFTRepository.ts (1)

12-13: Decouple update input from domain class.

Consider Partial instead of Partial to avoid leaking the concrete domain class into the repository boundary.

-  update(id: string, nft: Partial<NFT>): Promise<NFT>;
+  update(id: string, nft: Partial<INFT>): Promise<NFT>;
src/modules/nft/use-cases/deleteNFT.ts (1)

6-8: Remove redundant await and add explicit return type.

Cleaner and avoids an extra microtask.

-  async execute(id: string) {
-    return await this.nftRepository.delete(id);
+  async execute(id: string): Promise<void> {
+    return this.nftRepository.delete(id);
src/modules/nft/use-cases/getNFT.ts (1)

6-8: Remove redundant await.

No behavioral change; just cleaner.

-  async execute(id: string) {
-    return await this.nftRepository.findById(id);
+  async execute(id: string) {
+    return this.nftRepository.findById(id);
src/modules/nft/use-cases/getNFTByUserId.ts (1)

6-8: Use a descriptive parameter name and remove redundant await.

Parameter represents a userId, not a generic id.

-  async execute(id: string, page: number, pageSize: number) {
-    return await this.nftRepository.findByUserId(id, page, pageSize);
+  async execute(userId: string, page: number, pageSize: number) {
+    return this.nftRepository.findByUserId(userId, page, pageSize);
src/modules/nft/use-cases/createNFT.ts (3)

16-17: Drop redundant await in return

return await adds an extra tick without benefit here.

-    return await this.nftRepository.create(nft);
+    return this.nftRepository.create(nft);

8-15: Optional: minimal DTO validation before constructing the entity

If invariants aren’t enforced in the domain constructor, add quick guards (empty/whitespace).

   async execute(data: CreateNFTDto): Promise<NFT> {
+    if (!data.userId?.trim() || !data.organizationId?.trim() || !data.description?.trim()) {
+      throw new Error("userId, organizationId, and description are required.");
+    }
     const nft = new NFT(

I can wire this to domain-specific errors and add unit tests if you want.


10-10: Replace time-based ID with crypto.randomUUID()
Dockerfile’s FROM node:18 base supports crypto.randomUUID() (Node ≥14.17), which avoids collision risks under concurrency and prevents timestamp leakage.

Apply in src/modules/nft/use-cases/createNFT.ts:

 import { INFTRepository } from "../application/repositories/INFTRepository";
+import { randomUUID } from "crypto";
@@ use-cases/createNFT.ts:10
-      Date.now().toString(),
+      randomUUID(),
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

💡 Knowledge Base configuration:

  • MCP integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 23a1f32 and 06434f8.

📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • src/modules/nft/application/repositories/INFTRepository.ts (1 hunks)
  • src/modules/nft/infrastructure/nft.repository.ts (1 hunks)
  • src/modules/nft/use-cases/createNFT.ts (1 hunks)
  • src/modules/nft/use-cases/deleteNFT.ts (1 hunks)
  • src/modules/nft/use-cases/getNFT.ts (1 hunks)
  • src/modules/nft/use-cases/getNFTByUserId.ts (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/modules/nft/infrastructure/nft.repository.ts (1)

19-20: No changes needed: Prisma accessor is correct. Schema defines model NFT, so prisma.nFT is the proper client accessor.

src/modules/nft/application/repositories/INFTRepository.ts (1)

1-2: LGTM on path updates.

Imports look consistent with module layout.

src/modules/nft/use-cases/createNFT.ts (1)

1-1: Import path relocation verified—no stale imports remain and interface file is present.

Comment on lines 1 to 4
import { PrismaClient } from "@prisma/client";
import { INFTRepository } from "./INFTRepository";
import { NFTDomain as NFT } from "../domain/entities/nft.entity";
import { NFTDomain as NFT } from "../../domain/entities/nft.entity";

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix incorrect import paths and add missing type import.

Repository is under infrastructure/, while INFTRepository lives under application/repositories and domain under nft/domain. Adjust paths and import INFT to align with INFTRepository’s signature.

 import { PrismaClient } from "@prisma/client";
-import { INFTRepository } from "./INFTRepository";
-import { NFTDomain as NFT } from "../../domain/entities/nft.entity";
+import { INFTRepository } from "../application/repositories/INFTRepository";
+import { INFT } from "../domain/interfaces/nft.interface";
+import { NFTDomain as NFT } from "../domain/entities/nft.entity";
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
import { PrismaClient } from "@prisma/client";
import { INFTRepository } from "./INFTRepository";
import { NFTDomain as NFT } from "../domain/entities/nft.entity";
import { NFTDomain as NFT } from "../../domain/entities/nft.entity";
import { PrismaClient } from "@prisma/client";
import { INFTRepository } from "../application/repositories/INFTRepository";
import { INFT } from "../domain/interfaces/nft.interface";
import { NFTDomain as NFT } from "../domain/entities/nft.entity";
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/modules/nft/infrastructure/nft.repository.ts around lines 1 to 4, the
import paths are wrong and a required INFT type is missing; update the
INFTRepository import to the correct application path (e.g. import {
INFTRepository } from "../../application/repositories/INFTRepository";) and
change the domain entity import to the correct domain path (e.g. import {
NFTDomain as NFT } from "../../domain/nft/entities/nft.entity";), and add the
missing INFT type import from its module so the repository signature matches
INFTRepository (e.g. import { INFT } from "../../domain/nft/types/INFT";).
Ensure relative paths are adjusted based on actual folder structure and exports.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant