Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

several bugfixes #21

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Apr 7, 2025
Merged

several bugfixes #21

merged 7 commits into from
Apr 7, 2025

Conversation

chmerdon
Copy link
Member

@chmerdon chmerdon commented Apr 1, 2025

-kwargs in RTK and BDM2 interpolators
-regions in integrate methods are recognized + proper dosctrings
-TangentFlux operator for H1 functions
-CellDofsParents for broken spaces should construct correctly now
-FEEvaluator can use dofgrid (default) instead of xgrid now
-get_coefficients and get_basissubset now have an additional xgrid argument (they need to be available for xgrid or dofgrid depending on the assembly grid)
(last three should fix some issues with Hdiv-FE on subgrids, related to ExtendableFEM issue #43)

chmerdon added 3 commits April 1, 2025 09:14
-kwargs in interpolators RTK and BDM2 interpolators
-CellDofsParents for broken spaces should construct correctly now
-FEEvaluator uses dofgrid instead of xgrid now
(last two should fix some issues with Hdiv-FE on subgrids)
- get_coeffs and get_basissubset depend on assembly grid (xgrid or dofgrid)
@pjaap
Copy link
Member

pjaap commented Apr 3, 2025

Is this ready for review? Please bump the version according to the changes.
We discussed today with @jpthiele that we should increase the version on the master branch right after we diverge from the released version.

@chmerdon
Copy link
Member Author

chmerdon commented Apr 3, 2025

I am still trying to get the Stokes-Darcy problem running... so maybe some further bugfixes are needed. So should I add the version change to 1.0 directly to this PR?

@pjaap
Copy link
Member

pjaap commented Apr 3, 2025

Yes, we make 1.0 now. And release it when it is ready

@chmerdon
Copy link
Member Author

chmerdon commented Apr 3, 2025

my Stokes-Darcy problem in ExtendableFEM seems to run now with these bugfixes, somebody can review the changes and merge

@chmerdon chmerdon requested review from jpthiele and pjaap April 3, 2025 19:41
@chmerdon
Copy link
Member Author

chmerdon commented Apr 6, 2025

now also the ExtendableFEM tests should work

Copy link
Member

@pjaap pjaap left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks basically good. One comment below.

If you are willing to polish: The commit messages are somewhat bad. I would reword them a bit and squash them into 4 commits. But this is up to you.

over the entities AT of the grid. The result on every item is written into integral4items.
As usual, qpinfo allows to access information
at the current quadrature point.
The length of the result needs to be specified via resultdim.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

where do I find resultdim?


over the entities AT of the grid. Here, qpinfo allows to access information
at the current quadrature point.
The length of the result needs to be specified via resultdim.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

resultdim is a parameter in this function. Maybe it was a c&p error above?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, you guessed correctly :) I fixed it now.

@chmerdon chmerdon merged commit 5b82674 into master Apr 7, 2025
10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants