Skip to content

Conversation

@lawrence-forooghian
Copy link
Collaborator

@lawrence-forooghian lawrence-forooghian commented Dec 8, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated project dependencies to newer versions to incorporate latest improvements and bug fixes.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 8, 2025

Walkthrough

Swift package dependencies are updated across manifest and lock files. The ably-cocoa dependency is pinned to a new revision, and ably-cocoa-plugin-support transitions from revision-based pinning to an exact version constraint of 0.3.0.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Package Lock Files
AblyLiveObjects.xcworkspace/xcshareddata/swiftpm/Package.resolved, Package.resolved
Updated originHash values and revision hashes for ably-cocoa and ably-cocoa-plugin-support dependencies to reflect new locked versions. Added version field "0.3.0" for ably-cocoa-plugin-support.
Package Manifest
Package.swift
Updated ably-cocoa revision hash. Replaced ably-cocoa-plugin-support revision-based constraint with exact version constraint "0.3.0" and removed associated TODO comment.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

  • Verify that the new revision hashes for ably-cocoa correspond to intended changes
  • Confirm that pinning ably-cocoa-plugin-support to exact version 0.3.0 is intentional and compatible with the project
  • Ensure all three files (two lock files and manifest) are in sync after the update

Poem

🐰 Swift packages dance in the night,
New revisions locked, dependencies tight,
Version 0.3.0 takes its place,
With hashes fresh and manifest grace!

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'Bump plugin-support to 0.3.0' directly reflects the main change: updating the ably-cocoa-plugin-support dependency to version 0.3.0.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch bump-plugin-support-to-0.3.0

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Disabled knowledge base sources:

  • Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ed21c46 and 2f1c594.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • AblyLiveObjects.xcworkspace/xcshareddata/swiftpm/Package.resolved (1 hunks)
  • Package.resolved (1 hunks)
  • Package.swift (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
**/*.swift

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (.cursor/rules/swift.mdc)

**/*.swift: Specify an explicit access control level (SwiftLint explicit_acl) for all declarations in Swift code (tests are exempt)
When extending a type, put the access level on the extension declaration rather than on each member (tests are exempt)
Prefer implicit .init(...) when the type can be inferred in initializer expressions
Prefer enum case shorthand (.caseName) when the type can be inferred
For JSONValue or WireValue, prefer using literal syntax via ExpressibleBy*Literal where possible
Prefer Swift raw string literals for JSON strings instead of escaping double quotes
When an array literal begins with an initializer expression, place the initializer on the line after the opening bracket

Files:

  • Package.swift
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (12)
  • GitHub Check: Example app, macOS (Xcode 16.3)
  • GitHub Check: Example app, iOS (Xcode 16.3)
  • GitHub Check: Xcode, tvOS (Xcode 16.3)
  • GitHub Check: Example app, tvOS (Xcode 16.3)
  • GitHub Check: Xcode, iOS (Xcode 16.3)
  • GitHub Check: Xcode, macOS (Xcode 16.3)
  • GitHub Check: SPM (Xcode 16.3)
  • GitHub Check: Xcode, release configuration, iOS (Xcode 16.3)
  • GitHub Check: Xcode, release configuration, tvOS (Xcode 16.3)
  • GitHub Check: Xcode, release configuration, macOS (Xcode 16.3)
  • GitHub Check: SPM, release configuration (Xcode 16.3)
  • GitHub Check: Generate code coverage
🔇 Additional comments (4)
Package.resolved (1)

2-2: Lock file update is expected.

The originHash change reflects updates to the dependency graph in Package.swift.

AblyLiveObjects.xcworkspace/xcshareddata/swiftpm/Package.resolved (1)

2-2: Workspace lock file is consistent with package lock file.

The dependency updates in the workspace-specific Package.resolved correctly mirror the changes in the root Package.resolved.

Also applies to: 9-9, 17-18

Package.swift (2)

23-24: TODO reminder: Unpin ably-cocoa before release.

The ably-cocoa dependency remains pinned to a specific revision. Ensure this TODO is tracked and addressed before the next release.


28-29: Successfully transitioned to version-based constraint.

The change from revision-based to exact: "0.3.0" aligns with the PR objective. The use of exact is appropriate for 0.x versions, as explained in the comment.

"location" : "https://github.com/ably/ably-cocoa",
"state" : {
"revision" : "4a394311f110b9a67b372934346605740f0e7a53"
"revision" : "cb8ea1890ed15af871ae5798dbd3e80480d8801c"
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🔴 Critical

🧩 Analysis chain

🌐 Web query:

ably-cocoa-plugin-support 0.3.0 release

💡 Result:

I couldn't find a 0.3.0 release. The ably-cocoa-plugin-support package's latest published version is 0.2.0 (released 2025-09-29), per the Swift Package Registry and Swift Package Index. [1][2]. The ably-cocoa package also depends on ably-cocoa-plugin-support 0.2.0. [3]

Sources:

  • Swift Package Registry — ably-cocoa-plugin-support (0.2.0). [1]
  • Swift Package Index — ably-cocoa-plugin-support (shows 0.2.0). [2]
  • ably-cocoa package listing (shows dependency on ably-cocoa-plugin-support 0.2.0). [3]

🌐 Web query:

ably-cocoa commit cb8ea1890ed15af871ae5798dbd3e80480d8801c

💡 Result:

Commit cb8ea1890ed15af871ae5798dbd3e80480d8801c (ably/ably-cocoa)

  • Message: "Bump plugin-support to 0.3.0". [1]
  • Author: lawrence-forooghian (committed on the ably/ably-cocoa repo). [1]
  • Files changed: Package.swift (updated ably-cocoa-plugin-support from a pinned revision to "0.3.0") and Package.resolved (lockfile update). +3 / −3 lines total. [1]
  • Parent: commit 44b2199. [1]

Source: GitHub commit page for cb8ea1890ed15af871ae5798dbd3e80480d8801c. [1][2]

References
[1] GitHub — ably/ably-cocoa commit cb8ea18.
[2] ably/ably-cocoa repository.


Verify ably-cocoa-plugin-support version 0.3.0 is released before merging.

The commit cb8ea1890ed15af871ae5798dbd3e80480d8801c exists in ably-cocoa (with message "Bump plugin-support to 0.3.0"), but version 0.3.0 of ably-cocoa-plugin-support is not currently published in the Swift Package Registry or Swift Package Index. The latest published version is 0.2.0 (released 2025-09-29). Ensure that version 0.3.0 has been officially released or tagged before updating Package.resolved, and verify compatibility with the current ably-cocoa dependency.

@lawrence-forooghian
Copy link
Collaborator Author

You can ignore this one

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants