docs: simplify the repository governance surface - #282
Conversation
The public root retained five translation tombstones, a completed launch runbook, a stale run inventory, duplicated agent policy, and an obsolete conduct-reporting address. Remove the confirmed deadweight, make AGENTS.md the shared policy imported by Claude Code, replace the conduct policy with a current enforceable version, and extend CI coverage to the governance files. Verified with source and field-run validation, Astro check and build, generated-route tests, full Markdown lint, workflow YAML parsing, external-link resolution, and all 220 legacy compatibility tests. SECURITY.md, CONTRIBUTING.md, and the six docs/decisions records remain unchanged.
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 15 minutes You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (10)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 67e82127d7
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| run records are immutable observations. corrections add a note or replacement run | ||
| instead of silently changing the original outcome. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
When a published run needs correction, deleting this paragraph removes the repository's only instruction to add a note or replacement rather than silently editing the original evidence; a repo-wide search finds no equivalent policy in the field-lab guide, schema, or validator. Move this invariant to the main field-lab documentation before removing the stale inventory so later corrections cannot erase the originally observed outcome.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
1 participant
rationale
the repository still carried seven completed or intentionally retired documents.
CLAUDE.mdduplicated the shared agent policy, and the conduct policy sent reports to an obsolete university address.what changed
AGENTS.mdcanonical through Claude Code native import syntax.retained exactly
SECURITY.mdCONTRIBUTING.mddocs/decisions/verification
cctests plus 175loretestsrollout
this is a repository-governance cleanup. it changes no public guide route, field-run evidence, plugin behavior, or legacy installation path. protected
mainand required checks remain the merge gate.