Skip to content

anivar/corrigibility-framework

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

83 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

Corrigibility Framework

Release License: CC0 ORCID

A structural framework for evaluating Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) and Epistemic Public Infrastructure (EPI).

Corrigibility: The structural capacity of those affected by a system to detect error, signal harm, and trigger correction—without incurring material loss or irreversible consequence.

Downloads

Paper Focus Download
Paper I: DPI Deterministic infrastructure (ledgers, registries, payment rails) PDF
Paper II: EPI Learned/agentic systems (AI, ML models) PDF

The Five Tests

Test Question DPI Focus EPI Focus
EXIT Can users refuse participation without penalty? Non-digital alternative Human fallback guaranteed
CODE Is the system's execution observable? Source code LWD-R (Logic, Weights, Data, Representation)
AUDIT Can independent parties verify behavior? Transaction logs Statistical bounds + drift monitoring
GOVERN Do affected populations have binding authority? RFC/charter process Action boundary protocol
FORK Can the system be replaced without permission? Code + data portability Compute accessibility

Fatal Failure Property: Failure of any single test disqualifies a system from designation as public infrastructure.

Schemas & Skills

See corrigibility-schema repository for:

  • Schemas: infrastructure.json and audit.json for DPI/EPI
  • Assessment Skills: skills/assess/ with test rules (EXIT, CODE, AUDIT, GOVERN, FORK)
  • Examples: Reference implementations

Key Concepts

DPI (Paper I)

  • Functional Exit Equivalence (FEE): Architectural guarantees that recreate error-signal strength when literal exit is impossible
  • Rule of the Ledger: When authority is exerted through synchronized, self-executing artifacts

EPI (Paper II)

  • LWD-R: Four-layer transparency (Logic, Weights, Data, Representation)
  • Action Boundary Protocol: Deterministic envelope around stochastic inference
  • Variety Drift: The growing gap between frozen model variety and evolving environmental variety
  • Compute Capture: When "open weights" fails FORK due to prohibitive retraining costs

Citation

@article{aravind2026corrigibility-dpi,
  author = {Aravind, Anivar A},
  title = {Corrigibility as a Structural Precondition for Digital Public Infrastructure},
  year = {2026}
}

@article{aravind2026corrigibility-epi,
  author = {Aravind, Anivar A},
  title = {Epistemic Capture and the Action Boundary},
  year = {2026}
}

License

CC0 1.0 (Public Domain)

Author

Anivar A Aravind · ORCID: 0009-0009-8995-0005

About

Corrigibility Framework: Structural tests (EXIT, CODE, AUDIT, GOVERN, FORK) for Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) and Epistemic Public Infrastructure (EPI/AI). Two papers: DPI (47p) and EPI (22p). CC0 licensed.

Topics

Resources

License

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Packages

 
 
 

Contributors