Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

HADOOP-19514: SecretManager logs at INFO in bin/hadoop calls #7537

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

cnauroth
Copy link
Contributor

Description of PR

Switch to debug level for logging SecretManager configured algorithm and key length. I really wanted to do more improvements in this class, like resolving the configuration in a constructor instead of static initialization and potentially reusing a pre-existing Configuration instance. I couldn't find a way to do that while maintaining backward-compatibility, and the class is annotated as public.

How was this patch tested?

On trunk, build the distro:

mvn -o -Pdist -Dtar -DskipTests -DskipShade -Dmaven.javadoc.skip=true clean package

Reproduce the bug:

cnauroth@d9699e10bb20:/tmp/dist/hadoop-3.5.0-SNAPSHOT$ bin/hadoop s3guard -D fs.s3a.delegation.token.binding=org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3a.auth.delegation.FullCredentialsTokenBinding bucket-info s3a://foo
...
2025-03-25 19:57:26,731 INFO token.SecretManager: Selected hash algorithm: HmacSHA1
2025-03-25 19:57:26,732 INFO token.SecretManager: Selected hash key length:64
...

Apply this patch, rebuild the distro and retest. The SecretManager logs don't appear. You can get them back by explicitly enabling debug logging:

cnauroth@d9699e10bb20:/tmp/dist/hadoop-3.5.0-SNAPSHOT$ bin/hadoop --loglevel DEBUG s3guard -D fs.s3a.delegation.token.binding=org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3a.auth.delegation.FullCredentialsTokenBinding bucket-info s3a://foo
...
2025-03-25 21:29:21,476 DEBUG token.SecretManager: Selected hash algorithm: HmacSHA1
2025-03-25 21:29:21,476 DEBUG token.SecretManager: Selected hash key length:64
...

For code changes:

  • Does the title or this PR starts with the corresponding JIRA issue id (e.g. 'HADOOP-17799. Your PR title ...')?
  • Object storage: have the integration tests been executed and the endpoint declared according to the connector-specific documentation?
  • If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under ASF 2.0?
  • If applicable, have you updated the LICENSE, LICENSE-binary, NOTICE-binary files?

@hadoop-yetus
Copy link

💔 -1 overall

Vote Subsystem Runtime Logfile Comment
+0 🆗 reexec 14m 9s Docker mode activated.
_ Prechecks _
+1 💚 dupname 0m 0s No case conflicting files found.
+0 🆗 codespell 0m 0s codespell was not available.
+0 🆗 detsecrets 0m 0s detect-secrets was not available.
+1 💚 @author 0m 0s The patch does not contain any @author tags.
-1 ❌ test4tests 0m 0s The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch.
_ trunk Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 35m 15s trunk passed
+1 💚 compile 15m 23s trunk passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.26+4-post-Ubuntu-1ubuntu120.04
+1 💚 compile 14m 0s trunk passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_442-8u442-b06us1-0ubuntu120.04-b06
+1 💚 checkstyle 1m 19s trunk passed
+1 💚 mvnsite 1m 39s trunk passed
+1 💚 javadoc 1m 15s trunk passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.26+4-post-Ubuntu-1ubuntu120.04
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 55s trunk passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_442-8u442-b06us1-0ubuntu120.04-b06
+1 💚 spotbugs 2m 32s trunk passed
+1 💚 shadedclient 35m 40s branch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
_ Patch Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 0m 53s the patch passed
+1 💚 compile 14m 55s the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.26+4-post-Ubuntu-1ubuntu120.04
+1 💚 javac 14m 55s the patch passed
+1 💚 compile 13m 29s the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_442-8u442-b06us1-0ubuntu120.04-b06
+1 💚 javac 13m 29s the patch passed
+1 💚 blanks 0m 0s The patch has no blanks issues.
+1 💚 checkstyle 1m 10s the patch passed
+1 💚 mvnsite 1m 36s the patch passed
+1 💚 javadoc 1m 11s the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.26+4-post-Ubuntu-1ubuntu120.04
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 54s the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_442-8u442-b06us1-0ubuntu120.04-b06
+1 💚 spotbugs 2m 39s the patch passed
+1 💚 shadedclient 35m 36s patch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
_ Other Tests _
+1 💚 unit 15m 10s hadoop-common in the patch passed.
+1 💚 asflicense 1m 4s The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
211m 43s
Subsystem Report/Notes
Docker ClientAPI=1.48 ServerAPI=1.48 base: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-7537/1/artifact/out/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR #7537
Optional Tests dupname asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite unit shadedclient spotbugs checkstyle codespell detsecrets
uname Linux 6c2e714cad3e 5.15.0-130-generic #140-Ubuntu SMP Wed Dec 18 17:59:53 UTC 2024 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool maven
Personality dev-support/bin/hadoop.sh
git revision trunk / b562ce1
Default Java Private Build-1.8.0_442-8u442-b06us1-0ubuntu120.04-b06
Multi-JDK versions /usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64:Ubuntu-11.0.26+4-post-Ubuntu-1ubuntu120.04 /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64:Private Build-1.8.0_442-8u442-b06us1-0ubuntu120.04-b06
Test Results https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-7537/1/testReport/
Max. process+thread count 1271 (vs. ulimit of 5500)
modules C: hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common U: hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common
Console output https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-7537/1/console
versions git=2.25.1 maven=3.6.3 spotbugs=4.2.2
Powered by Apache Yetus 0.14.0 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

Copy link
Contributor

@steveloughran steveloughran left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1

@cnauroth cnauroth closed this in 9f7aa72 Mar 26, 2025
@cnauroth
Copy link
Contributor Author

I committed this to trunk. Thank you for the reviews, @slfan1989 and @steveloughran .

@szetszwo
Copy link
Contributor

@cnauroth , thanks for working on this!

@slfan1989 , @steveloughran , thanks for reviewing this!

You guys are very fast! I was going to submit a PR and found that it had been already done.

@cnauroth
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cnauroth , thanks for working on this!

@slfan1989 , @steveloughran , thanks for reviewing this!

You guys are very fast! I was going to submit a PR and found that it had been already done.

Happy to help, @szetszwo !

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants