Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

HBASE-29207 The backup system table should be considered a system table #6842

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

rmdmattingly
Copy link
Contributor

@rmdmattingly rmdmattingly commented Mar 21, 2025

Some might argue that this table should be named system:backup instead of backup:system, but c'est la vie

@rmdmattingly rmdmattingly requested a review from ndimiduk March 21, 2025 18:45
@Apache-HBase

This comment has been minimized.

@Apache-HBase

This comment has been minimized.

Comment on lines +304 to +312
} else if (Bytes.equals(NamespaceDescriptor.BACKUP_NAMESPACE_NAME, namespace)) {
this.namespace = NamespaceDescriptor.BACKUP_NAMESPACE_NAME;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I’m not sure, to be honest. If we were back in time I’d recommend not supporting that feature at all. Do you have any ideas?

@Apache-HBase

This comment has been minimized.

@Apache-HBase

This comment has been minimized.

@rmdmattingly
Copy link
Contributor Author

Wow, I see now why this wasn’t listed as a system table initially. We take snapshots of the backups table periodically, and you cannot take snapshots of system tables. Test failures caught this disconnect of intentions.

I’ll think a bit about this, but I wonder if we should make an exception for allowing backup system table snapshots.

@Apache-HBase
Copy link

🎊 +1 overall

Vote Subsystem Runtime Logfile Comment
+0 🆗 reexec 0m 29s Docker mode activated.
_ Prechecks _
+1 💚 dupname 0m 0s No case conflicting files found.
+0 🆗 codespell 0m 0s codespell was not available.
+0 🆗 detsecrets 0m 0s detect-secrets was not available.
+1 💚 @author 0m 0s The patch does not contain any @author tags.
+1 💚 hbaseanti 0m 0s Patch does not have any anti-patterns.
_ master Compile Tests _
+0 🆗 mvndep 0m 10s Maven dependency ordering for branch
+1 💚 mvninstall 3m 47s master passed
+1 💚 compile 2m 11s master passed
+1 💚 checkstyle 0m 43s master passed
+1 💚 spotbugs 2m 3s master passed
+1 💚 spotless 0m 47s branch has no errors when running spotless:check.
_ Patch Compile Tests _
+0 🆗 mvndep 0m 12s Maven dependency ordering for patch
+1 💚 mvninstall 3m 39s the patch passed
+1 💚 compile 2m 14s the patch passed
+1 💚 javac 2m 14s the patch passed
+1 💚 blanks 0m 0s The patch has no blanks issues.
+1 💚 checkstyle 0m 50s the patch passed
+1 💚 spotbugs 2m 30s the patch passed
+1 💚 hadoopcheck 12m 0s Patch does not cause any errors with Hadoop 3.3.6 3.4.0.
+1 💚 spotless 0m 44s patch has no errors when running spotless:check.
_ Other Tests _
+1 💚 asflicense 0m 25s The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
41m 6s
Subsystem Report/Notes
Docker ClientAPI=1.43 ServerAPI=1.43 base: https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-6842/3/artifact/yetus-general-check/output/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR #6842
Optional Tests dupname asflicense javac spotbugs checkstyle codespell detsecrets compile hadoopcheck hbaseanti spotless
uname Linux 085e0a9925a4 5.4.0-1103-aws #111~18.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Tue May 23 20:04:10 UTC 2023 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool maven
Personality dev-support/hbase-personality.sh
git revision master / 2eaa884
Default Java Eclipse Adoptium-17.0.11+9
Max. process+thread count 81 (vs. ulimit of 30000)
modules C: hbase-common hbase-client hbase-backup U: .
Console output https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-6842/3/console
versions git=2.34.1 maven=3.9.8 spotbugs=4.7.3
Powered by Apache Yetus 0.15.0 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

@Apache-HBase
Copy link

🎊 +1 overall

Vote Subsystem Runtime Logfile Comment
+0 🆗 reexec 0m 28s Docker mode activated.
-0 ⚠️ yetus 0m 3s Unprocessed flag(s): --brief-report-file --spotbugs-strict-precheck --author-ignore-list --blanks-eol-ignore-file --blanks-tabs-ignore-file --quick-hadoopcheck
_ Prechecks _
_ master Compile Tests _
+0 🆗 mvndep 0m 23s Maven dependency ordering for branch
+1 💚 mvninstall 3m 23s master passed
+1 💚 compile 0m 58s master passed
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 46s master passed
+1 💚 shadedjars 5m 58s branch has no errors when building our shaded downstream artifacts.
_ Patch Compile Tests _
+0 🆗 mvndep 0m 13s Maven dependency ordering for patch
+1 💚 mvninstall 3m 6s the patch passed
+1 💚 compile 0m 58s the patch passed
+1 💚 javac 0m 58s the patch passed
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 45s the patch passed
+1 💚 shadedjars 5m 54s patch has no errors when building our shaded downstream artifacts.
_ Other Tests _
+1 💚 unit 2m 13s hbase-common in the patch passed.
+1 💚 unit 1m 35s hbase-client in the patch passed.
+1 💚 unit 16m 0s hbase-backup in the patch passed.
44m 16s
Subsystem Report/Notes
Docker ClientAPI=1.43 ServerAPI=1.43 base: https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-6842/3/artifact/yetus-jdk17-hadoop3-check/output/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR #6842
Optional Tests javac javadoc unit compile shadedjars
uname Linux c3dc0fd5fd31 5.4.0-1103-aws #111~18.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Tue May 23 20:04:10 UTC 2023 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool maven
Personality dev-support/hbase-personality.sh
git revision master / 2eaa884
Default Java Eclipse Adoptium-17.0.11+9
Test Results https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-6842/3/testReport/
Max. process+thread count 3712 (vs. ulimit of 30000)
modules C: hbase-common hbase-client hbase-backup U: .
Console output https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-6842/3/console
versions git=2.34.1 maven=3.9.8
Powered by Apache Yetus 0.15.0 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

@ndimiduk
Copy link
Member

you cannot take snapshots of system tables

Wait you can't take a snapshot of meta? I feel like this is something I've done before. Maybe I was just taking a "dump"/export...

@rmdmattingly
Copy link
Contributor Author

According to the precondition tripped by those tests, one cannot

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants