[vdusek]

Actor.new_client() did not pass api_public_url to ApifyClientAsync, so the public URLs its clients build (for example from get_record_public_url) always pointed to https://api.apify.com, which is wrong on any non-production API. It takes the value from APIFY_API_PUBLIC_BASE_URL via the configuration, the same way the SDK's storage clients and the JS Actor.newClient() do, and accepts an api_public_url override next to api_url.

✍️ Drafted by Claude Code

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 93.81%. Comparing base (46824ef) to head (6477825).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1229      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   93.84%   93.81%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files          54       54              
  Lines        3800     3800              
==========================================
- Hits         3566     3565       -1     
- Misses        234      235       +1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
e2e	31.47% <ø> (ø)
integration	51.39% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
unit	91.00% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[apify-factory]

Looks good, nothing blocking.

🏭 Apify Factory auto approved ✅ — green across the board, coffee break earned

Every gate passed, and neither the reviewer nor a juror found anything a human needs to look at.

_{Approval locked to 10c903dc6 · workflow run}

Withdrawn because the content changed since the last verdict, and pushes are not re-reviewed.

[apify-factory]

Looks good, nothing blocking.

🏭 Factory review — ℹ️ not auto-approved

This change was reviewed but cannot be auto-approved: a gate failed, so the review cannot end in an approval.

check	result
Static gates	❌ 15/16 — file-extensions
Review findings	✅ none
Reviewer escalation	✅ none
Juror 1 — claude-sonnet-5-5, adversarial	⏭️ skipped — a gate failed

Why it was not auto-approved

Failed gates:

• file-extensions: disallowed extension: docs/02_concepts/08_access_apify_api.mdx

The comments above are the review itself; this section only explains the approval decision. Push a change and request @apify-factory again to re-run it, or ask a human to review.

_{Reviewed 6477825c5 · workflow run}

[Mantisus]

LGTM

[apify-approval-mirror]

Mirroring approval from @Mantisus.