Skip to content

Conversation

@JonathanOppenheimer
Copy link
Member

@JonathanOppenheimer JonathanOppenheimer commented Nov 20, 2025

Syncs ava-labs/coreth#1394, but not really...

These changes are more just general divergences between subnet-evm and coreth that are corrected here. If you don't think this is appropriate, please just close this PR.

  • Requesting Austin as he was the original author
  • Requesting Cey for maintainer review

@JonathanOppenheimer JonathanOppenheimer changed the title ci: Missing test import lint (#1394) sync: coreth PR #1394: ci: Missing test import lint (#1394) Nov 21, 2025
@JonathanOppenheimer JonathanOppenheimer self-assigned this Nov 21, 2025
@JonathanOppenheimer JonathanOppenheimer changed the title sync: coreth PR #1394: ci: Missing test import lint (#1394) sync: coreth PR #1394: ci: Missing test import lint Nov 21, 2025
@JonathanOppenheimer JonathanOppenheimer marked this pull request as ready for review November 21, 2025 17:19
@JonathanOppenheimer JonathanOppenheimer requested a review from a team as a code owner November 21, 2025 17:19
@JonathanOppenheimer JonathanOppenheimer force-pushed the JonathanOppenheimer/sync-pr-1394-ci-lint-fixes branch from 2c325eb to 8752280 Compare November 22, 2025 05:10
@maru-ava maru-ava removed their request for review November 24, 2025 13:02
ctx := t.Context()
snowCtx := utilstest.NewTestSnowContext(t)
snowCtx := snowtest.Context(t, SubnetEVMTestChainID)
validatorState := utilstest.NewTestValidatorState()
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we need to separately define this to set GetValidatorSetF on line 96.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants