-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 488
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
update: Re-instated FSxN lab #1259
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for eks-workshop ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewed and approved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Changes approved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the PR @mickeysh
The main thing I think is missing is a cleanup.sh
script as seen here. It will need to basically unwind every command the user does during your lab (uninstall helm chart, cleanup Kubernetes resource etc). See EFS version:
Some other smaller comments added inline.
lab/iam/policies/labs4.yaml
Outdated
- fsx:ListTagsForResource | ||
Resource: | ||
- ["*"] | ||
- Effect: Allow |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We should be able to consolidate these permissions in to the secretsmanager ones in labs1.yaml so we aren't spreading permissions for the same service over multiple files.
Statement: | ||
- Effect: Allow | ||
Action: | ||
- fsx:CreateFileSystem |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is it possible to lock some of these down a little bit, for example using RequestTag
like here
aws:RequestTag/env: |
…, add tag conditions for FSxN IAM resources
What this PR does / why we need it:
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Quality checks
make test module="<module>"
it was successful (see https://github.com/aws-samples/eks-workshop-v2/blob/main/docs/automated_tests.md)By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.