Skip to content

add release config for specifying smithy-rs version as a dependency #1290

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
May 22, 2025

Conversation

aajtodd
Copy link
Contributor

@aajtodd aajtodd commented May 15, 2025

Motivation and Context

  • Adds a new config.json for specifying release configuration. Right now this just holds a new "dependencies" section for specifying the version of smithy-rs code generator and runtime to use when making a release. This will be picked up by the catapult release stack during release
  • Adds a new CI check for verifying the config.json smithy-rs version set actually exists before being merged.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

@aajtodd aajtodd marked this pull request as ready for review May 16, 2025 15:50
@aajtodd aajtodd requested a review from a team as a code owner May 16, 2025 15:50
@aajtodd aajtodd merged commit bfd8100 into main May 22, 2025
1 check passed
@aajtodd aajtodd deleted the aajtodd/dyn-config branch May 22, 2025 16:57
aajtodd pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 23, 2025
## Motivation and Context
<!-- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? -->
<!-- If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here -->
`config.json` file was added in
#1290, but was removed by a
daily release since it was not tracked in `.handwritten`. This PR puts
it back in place and adds it to `.handwritten`.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify,
copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your
choice.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants