Skip to content

Conversation

@BethGriggs
Copy link
Collaborator

As discussed in the Community Plugins SIG.

While working on this, I realised it might be more effective to tie this process to the existing stale bot. That way, instead of manually tracking timeline, the @backstage/community-plugins-maintainers team can filter by the stale and dependencies labels to identify which PRs need action. It also means that if we tweak the staleness timeframes in the bot configuration, this process would automatically stay aligned with those values.

✔️ Checklist

  • All your commits have a Signed-off-by line in the message. (more info)

@BethGriggs BethGriggs requested a review from a team as a code owner October 22, 2025 10:17
@BethGriggs BethGriggs requested a review from vinzscam October 22, 2025 10:17
Copy link
Contributor

@awanlin awanlin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @BethGriggs, this makes a ton of sense to me 👍

Copy link
Contributor

@Parsifal-M Parsifal-M left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I like this because it's always been a pain point for me having to decide whether to merge something or not that is a dependency across multiple workspaces (even if a patch/minor)

@awanlin awanlin merged commit 7605bf5 into backstage:main Oct 24, 2025
10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants