Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
AddressIndex improvements: LastUnused, FirstUnused, and get_batch_unused_addresses() #546
AddressIndex improvements: LastUnused, FirstUnused, and get_batch_unused_addresses() #546
Changes from all commits
7528f6c
ef793e4
0a8e368
0adc52a
bcfee8f
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would like to see the test situation here where we extract multiple addresses, use some of them and get back a previous unused one when called again.. That would correctly test the intended behavior.. Right now its just testing the vanilla situation..
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm I actually don't know a better test to write than this one? With the batch unused you can write a more complicated test but with
FristUnused
there's not much you can do.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Something like derive a bunch of address.. Only use some of them selectively so the address gaps are simulated.. Then check if the first unused is returned correctly.. Am I missing some details why that can't work??
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It can work but I don't get why the gaps would effect the algorithm that finds the first unused. I mean I don't think that this will likely find a problem with the algorithm that this test wouldn't find.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Its not that the gaps would affect the algorithm, but to confirm that the behavior we are intending here is actually happening.. And this can be checked in single test for both first and last unused.. Once the behavior is pinned, we can decide later which one to use when or to keep both..