Skip to content

Add license scan report and status #2

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

fossabot
Copy link

Your FOSSA integration was successful! Attached in this PR is a badge and license report to track scan status in your README.

Below are docs for integrating FOSSA license checks into your CI:

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hello @fossabot, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

Summary of Changes

As gemini-code-assist, I've reviewed this pull request. The primary goal is to integrate FOSSA for license scanning into the repository. This PR, seemingly automated by fossabot, adds FOSSA status badges to the README.md file to display the current scan status and link to the detailed report. The description also provides helpful links for integrating FOSSA into various CI systems.

Highlights

  • FOSSA Integration: Integrates FOSSA license scanning into the project to track license compliance.
  • README Updates: Adds FOSSA status badges (a shield and a large badge) and a 'License' section to the README.md file, linking to the FOSSA project page for detailed reports.

Changelog

  • README.md
    • Added FOSSA status shield badge linking to the FOSSA project.
    • Added a 'License' heading.
    • Added FOSSA large status badge linking to the FOSSA project.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.


README gets new links,
FOSSA checks the code for free,
Licenses are clear.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request, initiated by FOSSA, successfully adds license scanning status badges to the README.md file. The changes are clear and directly address the goal of integrating FOSSA's license tracking into the project's main documentation. This is a valuable addition for maintaining awareness of dependency licenses and project compliance.

Summary of Findings

  • Markdown Formatting: Excessive Blank Lines: In README.md, three consecutive blank lines (new lines 3-5 in the diff) are introduced between the top FOSSA badge and the 'License' heading. While this is functional, reducing this to a single blank line is more conventional in Markdown and can improve readability. This is a low-severity stylistic suggestion. A review comment was not created for this low-severity issue due to the repository's review settings, which restrict comments to medium severity or higher. You might consider changing the content of lines 3-5 from three blank lines to one.
  • File Formatting: Missing Newline at End of File: The README.md file is missing a newline character at its very end (after the new line 7 in the diff). It's a standard practice for text files, including Markdown files, to end with a newline. This ensures POSIX compatibility, can prevent issues with some version control diffs, and is generally good practice for text file handling in various tools. This is a low-severity issue. A review comment was not created for this low-severity issue due to the repository's review settings. You might consider adding a newline character at the end of the file.

Merge Readiness

The pull request is in good shape and effectively achieves its stated goal of adding FOSSA license scan reporting to the README. The changes are straightforward, beneficial, and clearly presented.

While there are a couple of minor, low-severity stylistic points noted in the findings summary (regarding blank lines and a missing newline at the end of the file), these are not critical and do not block merging. The author may consider addressing them for improved consistency with common formatting practices.

Based on this review, the PR appears ready for merging. As an AI assistant, I cannot approve the PR myself; please ensure it undergoes any further necessary human review and approval processes within your team before merging.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant