Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
The Solana RpcClient should optionally support Tor/SOCKS5 proxies.
Describe the solution you'd like
An optional parameter accepting a proxy address (and port).
Describe alternatives you've considered
We could set up a local HttpClient (or similar) which would forward traffic to a Tor/SOCKS5 proxy and use that as our RpcClient node address, but not all platforms support local HttpClients equally (some need non-HTTPS options enabled, etc.)
Additional context
Stack Wallet wants to add Solana, but wants it to use Tor if that preference is enabled.
The previous issue #1377 was closed by @antoineherzog as completed without being resolved. Antoine, is this feature not desired? Although the functionality is complete in my original PR, @ookami-kb requested changes which are so far incomplete. I am unable to test all wallets functions, lacking enough Solana for certain features.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
The Solana RpcClient should optionally support Tor/SOCKS5 proxies.
Describe the solution you'd like
An optional parameter accepting a proxy address (and port).
Describe alternatives you've considered
We could set up a local HttpClient (or similar) which would forward traffic to a Tor/SOCKS5 proxy and use that as our RpcClient node address, but not all platforms support local HttpClients equally (some need non-HTTPS options enabled, etc.)
Additional context
Stack Wallet wants to add Solana, but wants it to use Tor if that preference is enabled.
The previous issue #1377 was closed by @antoineherzog as
completedwithout being resolved. Antoine, is this feature not desired? Although the functionality is complete in my original PR, @ookami-kb requested changes which are so far incomplete. I am unable to test all wallets functions, lacking enough Solana for certain features.