Skip to content

Conversation

@SanderVanRiessen
Copy link
Contributor

@SanderVanRiessen SanderVanRiessen commented Oct 13, 2025

This PR is a fix for the following issue: #307

Copy link
Contributor

@vados-cosmonic vados-cosmonic left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @SanderVanRiessen thanks for this addition -- it looks good to me, but I'd love some tests here to back the new functionality, and regression-proof the old functionality if you don't mind!

@vados-cosmonic
Copy link
Contributor

BTW, please ignore the windows CI failures -- we're unfortunately having problems with the windows jobs in CI right now.

@vados-cosmonic vados-cosmonic force-pushed the fix/duplicated-function-names-for-same-interfaces-and-export branch from c71e88e to 806e832 Compare October 17, 2025 07:45
@vados-cosmonic
Copy link
Contributor

CI failures from the windows runs should be good to go now!

Copy link
Contributor

@vados-cosmonic vados-cosmonic left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 🚀

Thanks for going above and beyond on this @SanderVanRiessen !

@vados-cosmonic vados-cosmonic merged commit 194cd9e into bytecodealliance:main Oct 24, 2025
12 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants