Enhancing security features #23
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
tlohmar
requested review from
PeterKovacs2,
alejandropalmier and
eric-murray
as code owners
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Scopes for DELETE operations should use the :delete suffix instead of the :destroy suffix for consistency with the HTTP operation names.
This is also supported by the Camara API Design Duidnes on Scope naming.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What type of PR is this?
Add one of the following kinds:
What this PR does / why we need it:
The Pull Request enhances the API specification with a security scheme and scopes for authorization, following the CAMARA security considerations.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes Issue #22
Special notes for reviewers:
Changelog input
Additional documentation
This section can be blank.