-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 968
Loosen pin on typing_extensions #2281
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2281 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 81.55% 81.55%
=======================================
Files 77 77
Lines 9541 9541
Branches 1162 1162
=======================================
Hits 7781 7781
Misses 1568 1568
Partials 192 192 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We will need a modified PR on this
Thanks for the speedy review!
Sure, happy to keep the ball rolling! What needs modifying? |
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ | |||
typing_extensions==4.12.2; python_version<"3.10" | |||
typing_extensions>=4.12.2; python_version<"3.10" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we can keep this as is and make the latest version available with python =>3.11
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this was pinned only for python version under 3.10
Hi, thanks for this tool!
This PR relaxes the dependency on
typing_extensions==
to be a>=
: tightly pinning this (very prevalent) package creates all kinds of issues when used in more complex environments. I didn't look deep enough, but it is likely this could be pinned to an even lower value, asParamSpec
andTypeGuard
have been stable for some time.