Skip to content

Conversation

@jayapradha-p
Copy link
Contributor

@jayapradha-p jayapradha-p commented Dec 24, 2025

[Buganizer ID: 463991564]GitSync playbook description with line breaks cause issues with readme file

Description

Please provide a detailed description of your changes. This helps reviewers understand your work and its context.

What problem does this PR solve?

When the "Push Playbook" job is run from the "GitSync" integration using the "Jinja" readme template, the table formatting in the resulting readme file breaks if any playbook contains line breaks.

This results in the table listing the playbooks in the README becoming broken or misaligned.

How does this PR solve the problem?

The fix removes these line breaks from the description text before the README is generated, ensuring each playbook's information remains on a single line and the table aligned correctly.

Checklist:

Please ensure you have completed the following items before submitting your PR.
This helps us review your contribution faster and more efficiently.

General Checks:

  • I have read and followed the project's contributing.md guide.
  • My code follows the project's coding style guidelines.
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code.
  • My changes do not introduce any new warnings.
  • My changes pass all existing tests.
  • I have added new tests where appropriate to cover my changes. (If applicable)
  • I have updated the documentation where necessary (e.g., README, API docs). (If applicable)

Open-Source Specific Checks:

  • My changes do not introduce any Personally Identifiable Information (PII) or sensitive customer data.
  • My changes do not expose any internal-only code examples, configurations, or URLs.
  • All code examples, comments, and messages are generic and suitable for a public repository.
  • I understand that any internal context or sensitive details related to this work are handled separately in internal systems (Buganizer for Google team members).

For Google Team Members and Reviewers Only:

  • I have included the Buganizer ID in the PR title or description (e.g., "Internal Buganizer ID: 123456789" or "Related Buganizer: go/buganizer/123456789").
  • I have ensured that all internal discussions and PII related to this work remain in Buganizer.
  • I have tagged the PR with one or more labels that reflect the pull request purpose.

Screenshots (If Applicable)

If your changes involve UI or visual elements, please include screenshots or GIFs here.
Ensure any sensitive data is redacted or generalized.


Further Comments / Questions

Any additional comments, questions, or areas where you'd like specific feedback.

@jayapradha-p jayapradha-p requested a review from a team as a code owner December 24, 2025 12:09
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @jayapradha-p, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request resolves a critical formatting bug within the GitSync integration. Previously, playbook descriptions containing line breaks would cause the generated README file's playbook table to render incorrectly. The solution involves sanitizing these descriptions by removing all newline and carriage return characters, thereby ensuring that the README's table structure remains intact and properly aligned, enhancing the readability and presentation of playbook information.

Highlights

  • README Formatting Fix: Addressed an issue where playbook descriptions containing line breaks would corrupt the table formatting in the generated README file.
  • Description Sanitization: Implemented a mechanism to remove newline and carriage return characters from playbook descriptions before they are used in the README template, ensuring single-line descriptions.
  • Version Bump: Incremented the GitSync integration version from 42.0 to 43.0 in pyproject.toml and uv.lock.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@github-actions
Copy link

Marketplace Validation Failed

Click to view the full report

Validation Report

🧩 Integrations
Pre-Build Stage

git_sync

Validation Name Details
⚠️ Integration Version Bump release_notes.yml file must be updated before PR

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request fixes an issue where newlines in playbook descriptions were breaking the formatting of generated README files. The change correctly removes these newlines. However, the implementation introduces a side effect by modifying shared data objects, which could lead to incorrect behavior in other parts of the application. I've provided a suggestion to resolve this by using a more robust and idiomatic Python approach that avoids data mutation. The other changes are version bumps and look good.

@github-actions
Copy link

Marketplace Validation Failed

Click to view the full report

Validation Report

🧩 Integrations
Pre-Build Stage

git_sync

Validation Name Details
⚠️ Integration Version Bump release_notes.yml file must be updated before PR

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Bug Something isn't working Git Sync

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants