-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 695
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Disable nonmaindb interface #7903
Changes from 4 commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ | ||
test: failure_non_main_db_2pc | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Is this schedule runnable? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Not actually, it includes the removed tests. "check_all_tests_are_run" complains without it. |
||
test: metadata_sync_from_non_maindb | ||
test: grant_on_database_propagation_from_non_maindb | ||
test: other_databases grant_role_from_non_maindb role_operations_from_non_maindb seclabel_non_maindb |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we also delete these files altogether, and not just remove the include line here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My goal is to remove only the interface with minimal changes. I kept the files because their C implementations are still present in the codebase.
As you suggested, we can also remove the SQL and test files altogether. This way, we wouldn't need the name change and the additional schedule (from other comments).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
the alternative #7905
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am leaning towards the alternative, especially for the
.sql
files. We don't keep.sql
files with a Citus version in their name that we don't use.I still think the changes are minimal if we remove the
.sql
files and the relevant tests as well. Wondering if codecov would complain though.