Skip to content

Conversation

@pull
Copy link

@pull pull bot commented Jan 28, 2026

See Commits and Changes for more details.


Created by pull[bot] (v2.0.0-alpha.4)

Can you help keep this open source service alive? 💖 Please sponsor : )

eps1lon and others added 2 commits January 28, 2026 18:41
@pull pull bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 28, 2026
@pull pull bot added the ⤵️ pull label Jan 28, 2026
jackpope and others added 3 commits January 28, 2026 14:45
This PR adds text node support to FragmentInstance operations, allowing
fragment refs to properly handle fragments that contain text nodes
(either mixed with elements or text-only).

Not currently adding/removing new text nodes as we don't need to track
them for events or observers in DOM. Will follow up on this and with
Fabric support.

## Support through parent element
- `dispatchEvent`
- `compareDocumentPosition`
- `getRootNode`

## Support through Range API
- `getClientRects`: Uses Range to calculate bounding rects for text
nodes
- `scrollIntoView`: Uses Range to scroll to text node positions directly

## No support
- `focus`/`focusLast`/`blur`: Noop for text-only fragments
- `observeUsing`:  Warns for text-only fragments in DEV
- `addEventListener`/`removeEventListener`: Ignores text nodes, but
still works on Fragment level through `dispatchEvent`
Stacked on #35630

- Adds test case for compareDocumentPosition, missing before and also
extending to text nodes
- Adds event handling fixture case for text
- Adds getRootNode fixture case for text
In #35646 I thought there was a
bug in trusted types, but the bug is in jsdom.

For trusted types we still want to check the coersion and throw for a
good dev warning, but prod will also throw becuase the browser will
implicitly coerce to a string. This ensures there's no behavior
difference between dev and prod.

So the right fix is to add in the JSDOM hack that's used in
`ReactDOMSelect-test.js`.
@pull pull bot merged commit 230772f into code:main Jan 29, 2026
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants