Skip to content

⚡️ Speed up function sorter by 59,907% #5

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

codeflash-ai[bot]
Copy link

@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot commented Apr 30, 2025

📄 59,907% (599.07x) speedup for sorter in src/dsa/various.py

⏱️ Runtime : 215 milliseconds 358 microseconds (best of 866 runs)

📝 Explanation and details

Certainly! The provided code implements bubble sort, which is inefficient (O(N²)). To rewrite this to run much faster but keep the same function signature and semantics, we can use Python’s built-in sort, which uses Timsort (O(N log N)). This both accelerates the operation and preserves the in-place sorting and return behavior.

Here’s the optimized code.

  • Explanation: arr.sort() sorts the list in-place in O(N log N) time.
  • Semantics: The original arr is sorted in-place and the sorted list is returned, as before.
  • Comments: No relevant code comments were present in the original, so none are added.

Let me know if you need to preserve the original sorting algorithm, but for speed, this is optimal.

Correctness verification report:

Test Status
⚙️ Existing Unit Tests 🔘 None Found
🌀 Generated Regression Tests 36 Passed
⏪ Replay Tests 🔘 None Found
🔎 Concolic Coverage Tests 🔘 None Found
📊 Tests Coverage 100.0%
🌀 Generated Regression Tests Details
import pytest  # used for our unit tests
from src.dsa.various import sorter

# unit tests

def test_sorted_list():
    # Test with an already sorted list
    codeflash_output = sorter([1, 2, 3, 4, 5])

def test_reverse_sorted_list():
    # Test with a reverse sorted list
    codeflash_output = sorter([5, 4, 3, 2, 1])

def test_unsorted_list():
    # Test with a random unsorted list
    codeflash_output = sorter([3, 1, 4, 1, 5, 9, 2, 6, 5, 3, 5])

def test_empty_list():
    # Test with an empty list
    codeflash_output = sorter([])

def test_single_element_list():
    # Test with a single element list
    codeflash_output = sorter([42])

def test_two_elements_list():
    # Test with a two-element list
    codeflash_output = sorter([2, 1])

def test_list_with_duplicates():
    # Test with a list containing duplicates
    codeflash_output = sorter([5, 3, 5, 2, 5])

def test_all_elements_same():
    # Test with a list where all elements are the same
    codeflash_output = sorter([7, 7, 7, 7])

def test_integers_and_floats():
    # Test with a list containing integers and floats
    codeflash_output = sorter([1, 2.5, 3, 0.5])

def test_strings():
    # Test with a list of strings
    codeflash_output = sorter(['apple', 'banana', 'cherry'])

def test_large_list():
    # Test with a large list of random integers
    large_list = list(range(10000, 9000, -1))
    sorted_large_list = list(range(1, 1001))
    codeflash_output = sorter(large_list)

def test_max_integer_values():
    # Test with maximum integer values
    codeflash_output = sorter([2147483647, -2147483648, 0])

def test_non_comparable_elements():
    # Test with a list containing non-comparable elements
    with pytest.raises(TypeError):
        sorter([1, 'two', 3])

def test_highly_unsorted_list():
    # Test with a highly unsorted list
    unsorted_list = [9, 7, 5, 3, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 0]
    sorted_list = [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
    codeflash_output = sorter(unsorted_list)
# codeflash_output is used to check that the output of the original code is the same as that of the optimized code.

import pytest  # used for our unit tests
from src.dsa.various import sorter

# unit tests

def test_sorted_list():
    # Test a list that is already sorted
    codeflash_output = sorter([1, 2, 3, 4, 5])
    codeflash_output = sorter([-3, -2, -1, 0, 1])

def test_unsorted_list():
    # Test a list that is unsorted
    codeflash_output = sorter([5, 3, 1, 4, 2])
    codeflash_output = sorter([10, 9, 8, 7, 6])

def test_reverse_sorted_list():
    # Test a list that is sorted in descending order
    codeflash_output = sorter([5, 4, 3, 2, 1])
    codeflash_output = sorter([100, 50, 10, 5, 1])

def test_empty_list():
    # Test an empty list
    codeflash_output = sorter([])

def test_single_element_list():
    # Test a list with a single element
    codeflash_output = sorter([1])
    codeflash_output = sorter([-1])

def test_list_with_duplicates():
    # Test a list with duplicate elements
    codeflash_output = sorter([3, 1, 2, 3, 1])
    codeflash_output = sorter([5, 5, 5, 5, 5])

def test_list_with_negative_numbers():
    # Test a list with negative numbers
    codeflash_output = sorter([-1, -3, -2, 0, 2])
    codeflash_output = sorter([-5, -10, 0, 5, 10])

def test_list_with_floats():
    # Test a list with floating-point numbers
    codeflash_output = sorter([1.1, 2.2, 0.5, 3.3])
    codeflash_output = sorter([-1.1, -2.2, 0.0, 1.1])

def test_list_with_integers_and_floats():
    # Test a list with both integers and floats
    codeflash_output = sorter([1, 2.2, 0.5, 3])
    codeflash_output = sorter([-1, -2.2, 0, 1.1])

def test_large_list():
    # Test a large list of random integers
    large_list = list(range(10000, 9000, -1))
    sorted_large_list = list(range(1, 1001))
    codeflash_output = sorter(large_list)

def test_performance_with_random_data():
    # Test the function's performance with a large list of random data
    random_data = [i % 100 for i in range(1000)]
    sorted_random_data = sorted(random_data)
    codeflash_output = sorter(random_data)

To edit these changes git checkout codeflash/optimize-sorter-ma4f3xwj and push.

Codeflash

Certainly! The provided code implements bubble sort, which is inefficient (O(N²)). To rewrite this to run much faster but keep the same function signature and semantics, we can use Python’s built-in sort, which uses Timsort (O(N log N)). This both accelerates the operation and preserves the in-place sorting and return behavior.

Here’s the optimized code.



- **Explanation**: `arr.sort()` sorts the list in-place in O(N log N) time.
- **Semantics**: The original arr is sorted in-place and the sorted list is returned, as before.  
- **Comments**: No relevant code comments were present in the original, so none are added.

Let me know if you need to preserve the original sorting algorithm, but for speed, this is optimal.
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot added the ⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI label Apr 30, 2025
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot requested a review from KRRT7 April 30, 2025 20:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants