⚡️ Speed up function sorter
by 59,907%
#5
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
📄 59,907% (599.07x) speedup for
sorter
insrc/dsa/various.py
⏱️ Runtime :
215 milliseconds
→358 microseconds
(best of866
runs)📝 Explanation and details
Certainly! The provided code implements bubble sort, which is inefficient (O(N²)). To rewrite this to run much faster but keep the same function signature and semantics, we can use Python’s built-in sort, which uses Timsort (O(N log N)). This both accelerates the operation and preserves the in-place sorting and return behavior.
Here’s the optimized code.
arr.sort()
sorts the list in-place in O(N log N) time.Let me know if you need to preserve the original sorting algorithm, but for speed, this is optimal.
✅ Correctness verification report:
🌀 Generated Regression Tests Details
To edit these changes
git checkout codeflash/optimize-sorter-ma4f3xwj
and push.