Skip to content

add aarch64 static cbc library for arm64 architecture #391

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

knutster
Copy link

@knutster knutster commented Oct 2, 2024

add aarch64 static cbc library for arm64 architectures. Verified on AWS Graviton 2 / 3 instances.

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Oct 2, 2024

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@knutster
Copy link
Author

knutster commented Oct 3, 2024

Added build scripts for ARM linux

@JoOkuma
Copy link

JoOkuma commented Dec 18, 2024

Hey @knutster, which version of the compiled libraries did you use?
Were you able to compile this using the master branch of all of them?
I'm trying to compile myself for a Linux build, but I'm having some issues.

@tkralphs
Copy link
Member

tkralphs commented May 6, 2025

Looks like this was already done in #367 .

@JoOkuma
Copy link

JoOkuma commented May 6, 2025

Hi @tkralphs, but this was never released into pypi, https://pypi.org/project/mip/#history
It's only available on version 1.16rc0.

@tkralphs
Copy link
Member

tkralphs commented May 7, 2025

Yes, it has not been released yet, but it is on PyPi and easily pip installable. Making the release is a separate issue and that should be easy once the maintainers decide they want to do that. Regardless of the release, this PR is a duplicate of #367 as far as I can see so I just wanted to alert you to that.

@JoOkuma
Copy link

JoOkuma commented May 7, 2025

@tkralphs, I completely agree it's is easily installable, but it's an issue when using dependencies because often release candidates are ignored and not considered valid packages so it seems as arm macos version is unavailable.

Nonetheless, I recognize most of you maintain this package on your free time and I don't mean to be pushy, I just wanted to provide some insight on why they might have opened this PR.

@tkralphs
Copy link
Member

tkralphs commented May 8, 2025

@JoOkuma OK, sorry if I misinterpreted, I thought you were saying that this PR should remain open. Indeed, it would be better if there was a release on Pypi with the ARM64 binaries.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants