Skip to content

Conversation

@rnjtranjan
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

Copy link
Member

@adithyaov adithyaov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it possible to use a custom data type in the state and document it. It would be much easier to understand/review.

Comment on lines +480 to +483
joinOuterMerge eq s1 =
IsStream.fromStreamD
. StreamD.joinOuterMerge eq (IsStream.toStreamD s1)
. IsStream.toStreamD
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Instead of a point free notation, having s2 here seems more eloquent.

Comment on lines +4034 to +4035
{-# INLINE_LATE step #-}

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
{-# INLINE_LATE step #-}
{-# INLINE_LATE step #-}

@rnjtranjan rnjtranjan requested a review from adithyaov January 12, 2022 12:04
@harendra-kumar harendra-kumar marked this pull request as draft July 5, 2023 17:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants