CI: update Canary and EL8 titles

[apostasie]

Fix #3988

[apostasie]

rootful 2.0.3 failure is #3513

canary and EL8 failure demonstrate the point of this PR

[fahedouch]

Sorry but I can't get how EL8 is configured here ?

[apostasie]

@fahedouch not sure what you are asking? but yeah, this one is somewhat tricky.
Alma 8 (which is the current EL derivative used here) is started in a Lima VM:

nerdctl/.github/workflows/test.yml

Lines 469 to 475 in d1f4890

	limactl start \
	--name=default \
	--cpus=4 \
	--memory=12 \
	--containerd=none \
	--set '.mounts=null | .portForwards=[{"guestSocket":"/var/run/docker.sock","hostSocket":"{{.Dir}}/sock/docker.sock"}]' \
	template://almalinux-8

Then we run the normal integration test suite inside an Ubuntu container (but of course with the EL 4.18 kernel).

[fahedouch]

oh yes! thanks.

[fahedouch]

So if I understand correctly, the MR is mergeable with the current issues ?

[apostasie]

Well, the maintainers should make a case by case call.

At least the contributors should not spend too much time trying to figure out what is up with these targets, and yes, IMO the maintainers may make judgment calls that "broken canary because of Hub carfuffle" should not prevent merging.

I do not know what are the current merge settings of the repo and if they require a green run though - up to you folks if you want to adjust that.

[fahedouch]

CI failure are note related to your PR, So for me it is mergeable!

[apostasie]

rootless failure is Docker Hub 429.

[fahedouch]

Thanks