Skip to content

Add Qwen3-Coder-Next as a release of qwen-coder - #984

Merged
ccerv1 merged 5 commits into
mainfrom
cc/laughing-allen-q6rqlz-qwen-coder-next
Nov 9, 2026
Merged

ccerv1 merged 5 commits into
mainfrom
cc/laughing-allen-q6rqlz-qwen-coder-next

Conversation

@ccerv1

@ccerv1 ccerv1 commented Nov 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

What

This applies R-2026-11-08-m (recorded in #981): Qwen3-Coder-Next is another release of qwen-coder, and the earlier checkpoints are kept. No published score changes.

  • Identity: Qwen/Qwen3-Coder-Next and -Base join the declared checkpoints; the four existing ones stay. The FP8 and GGUF builds of Next are left out as quantizations (R-2026-10-17-b). The description now covers the line.
  • Openness: governing_release moves to qwen3-coder-next, the current release. It stays at 3, open weights: Apache-2.0, not gated, no training data or pipeline. check_rubric reproduces it. The axis is re-read and dated 2026-11-08 against Next's card, its Hub API record and the Qwen3-Coder README, which lists all three generations in one table. Artificial Analysis marks the 480B model deprecated in favor of Next.
  • Adoption: the level stays 4, with no counts typed in. The old date was measured on the four earlier checkpoints only. So the axis is held with settled_by: scheduled_reconciliation, as fix(adoption): re-band colpali, openclip, siglip, modernvbert and tensorlake-sandbox on declared families and channels #904 did for colpali, until the next scheduled reconciliation measures the full declaration.
  • Capability: the band is unchanged and stays held. The hold's reason now says the superseded-flagship question no longer applies under R-2026-11-08-m. What's still missing is an independent reading: Artificial Analysis publishes no Intelligence Index score for either release.

Follow-ups, not done here

  • The 480B model is declared only as its FP8 build (Qwen3-Coder-480B-A35B-Instruct-FP8). That's a quantization; the BF16 checkpoint is undeclared. It was kept because the ruling says to retain the existing checkpoints.
  • Several Qwen2.5-Coder checkpoints are undeclared: 0.5B, 1.5B, 3B and 14B Instruct, plus the base models. 14B-Instruct alone draws about 2M downloads a month. Declaring them would change the adoption sum, so it belongs in its own PR.

Checklist

  • uv run python -m build.validate prints 0 error(s)
  • New/changed scores cite sources (url, shows, accessed), each re-fetched 2026-11-08 with build.fetch_source
  • I did not edit build/notebook_data.json or notebooks/ai-stack-map.py
  • Product appears in exactly one category roster and one org roster: unchanged
  • Label: none (hand work)

check_rubric, check_verification, check_capability and check_artifacts pass, as does preflight --skip-tests (all 18 locally runnable steps). Also run: the score-note and product-prose tests, and the identity, review-queue, adoption-freshness, verification, validate and rulings tests.


Generated by Claude Code

Qwen3-Coder-Next joins the qwen-coder line, and the earlier checkpoints stay
declared. Qwen3-Coder-Next and Qwen3-Coder-Next-Base are added to the
declared Hugging Face checkpoints. Qwen's FP8 and GGUF builds of Next are
left out as quantizations (R-2026-10-17-b).

Openness now follows Qwen3-Coder-Next, the newest release. It was re-read
on 2026-11-08 against Next's model card, its Hub record and the Qwen3-Coder
README. Next ships Apache-2.0 too, so the score stays 3, open weights.

The adoption level stays 4. The scheduled measurement behind its date
covered only the four earlier checkpoints, so the date is dropped and the
axis is held for the next scheduled reconciliation.

The capability band is unchanged and stays held. Artificial Analysis
publishes no Intelligence Index score for either release, so there is no
independent reading yet. The hold now says that is what is missing.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01MkT3WvZoSS9jdW8QK1CFUg
qwen-coder now declares the Qwen3-Coder-Next checkpoints, which the
frozen observation snapshot never saw, so its Hugging Face sum covers
some declared primaries and the row abstains. Dumped against main: 338
rows on both sides, and only qwen-coder's row differs. The digest and
the named abstention set move with dated comments, as before.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01MkT3WvZoSS9jdW8QK1CFUg
Review fix for #984: the note claimed the measurement covered every
declared checkpoint, including Qwen3-Coder-Next. It covered only the
four earlier ones, as the verification hold says. The note now says the
reading is carried over and the expanded set awaits measurement. The
level is unchanged.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01MkT3WvZoSS9jdW8QK1CFUg
@ccerv1
ccerv1 marked this pull request as ready for review November 9, 2026 01:31
@ccerv1
ccerv1 merged commit 1e3fe18 into main Nov 9, 2026
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants