Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Referral Task Card component #33014

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

juancstlm-a6
Copy link
Contributor

Note: Delete the description statements, complete each step. None are optional, but can be justified as to why they cannot be completed as written. Provide known gaps to testing that may raise the risk of merging to production.

Are you removing, renaming or moving a folder in this PR?

  • No, I'm not changing any folders (skip to TeamSites and delete the rest of this section)
  • Yes, I'm removing, renaming or moving a folder

If the folder you changed contains a manifest.json, search for its entryName in the content-build registry.json (the entryName there will match).

If an entry for this folder exists in content-build and you are:

  1. Deleting a folder:

    1. First search vets-website for all instances of the entryName in your manifest.json and remove them in a separate PR. Look particularly for references in src/applications/static-pages/static-pages-entry.js and src/platform/forms/constants.js. If you do not do this, other applications will break!
      • Add the link to your merged vets-website PR here
    2. Then, Delete the application entry in registry.json and merge that PR before this one
      • Add the link to your merged content-build PR here
  2. Renaming or moving a folder: Update the entry in the registry.json, but do not merge it until your vets-website changes here are merged. The content-build PR must be merged immediately after your vets-website change is merged in to avoid CI errors with content-build (and Tugboat).

⚠️ TeamSites ⚠️

Examples of a TeamSite: https://va.gov/health and https://benefits.va.gov/benefits/. This scenario is also referred to as the "injected" header and footer. You can reach out in the #sitewide-public-websites Slack channel for questions.

Did you change site-wide styles, platform utilities or other infrastructure?

Summary

  • Adds a Referral Task Card component that only shows when a feature flag is on and UUID is passed to the main appointments page ex: /appointments/?id=add2f0f4-a1ea-4dea-a504-a54ab57c68

Related issue(s)

department-of-veterans-affairs/va.gov-team#95265

Testing done

  • Unit tests for component logic
  • Added tests for main appointments page
  • In order to test this the feature vaOnlineSchedulingCCDirectScheduling must be enabled and a id supplied such as /my-health/appointments/?id=add2f0f4-a1ea-4dea-a504-a54ab57c68
  • Pass in referral object and ensure the component renders as expected
  • Pass in expired referral object and ensure the card does not show

Screenshots

Note: This field is mandatory for UI changes (non-component work should NOT have screenshots).

Before After
Mobile Screen Shot 2024-11-13 at 23 18 44 Screen Shot 2024-11-13 at 22 58 54
Desktop Screenshot 2024-11-13 at 23-18-38 Appointments Veterans Affairs Screenshot 2024-11-13 at 22-59-45 Appointments Veterans Affairs

What areas of the site does it impact?

  • Appointments list feature in VAOS

Acceptance criteria

  • Create component for displaying referral as task card
  • component takes referral object as prop
    - [ ] fetch referral from redux by UUID
  • conditionally show if UUID passed and feature is on
  • show date in Month DD, YYYY format
  • add unit tests

Quality Assurance & Testing

  • I fixed|updated|added unit tests and integration tests for each feature (if applicable).
  • No sensitive information (i.e. PII/credentials/internal URLs/etc.) is captured in logging, hardcoded, or specs
  • Linting warnings have been addressed
  • Documentation has been updated (link to documentation *if necessary)
  • Screenshot of the developed feature is added
  • Accessibility testing has been performed

Error Handling

  • Browser console contains no warnings or errors.
  • Events are being sent to the appropriate logging solution
  • Feature/bug has a monitor built into Datadog or Grafana (if applicable)

Authentication

  • Did you login to a local build and verify all authenticated routes work as expected with a test user

Requested Feedback

(OPTIONAL) What should the reviewers know in addition to the above. Is there anything specific you wish the reviewer to assist with. Do you have any concerns with this PR, why?

  • Data pulled from Redux will be done in separate ticket

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[2 pts left] Create Task Card Component
2 participants