Fixed wording in "Modifiers with compare points" example #68
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The wording in one of the examples under "Modifiers with compare points" was incorrect. It stated that `2d6>3!<4` would explode rolls greater than 4, when this notation actually will only explode rolls less than 4. Fixed this by just updating "greater than 4" to "less than 4"
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The wording in one of the examples under "Modifiers with compare points" was incorrect. It stated that
2d6>3!<4would explode rolls greater than 4, when this notation actually will only explode rolls less than 4.Fixed this by just updating "greater than 4" to "less than 4"