Create main.tf

[ZIJ]

No description provided.

[infrabaseai]

Potential issues found:

1. The aws_s3_bucket resource definition is missing its local name. Based on references in other resources (aws_s3_bucket.bucket.id), it was likely intended to be resource "aws_s3_bucket" "bucket" { ... }. The current definition is a syntax error and will prevent Terraform from parsing the configuration.
2. For improved security, it is highly recommended to add an aws_s3_bucket_public_access_block resource to explicitly configure and block all public access to the S3 bucket.

[infrabaseai]

Potential issues found:

1. The aws_s3_bucket resource declaration is missing its required local name. This will cause a Terraform parsing error. Based on references in other resources (e.g., aws_s3_bucket.bucket.id), the intended declaration was likely resource "aws_s3_bucket" "bucket" { ... }.

[infrabaseai]

Potential issues found:

1. The aws_s3_bucket resource definition is missing its local name. Based on references in other resources (aws_s3_bucket.bucket.id), it was likely intended to be resource "aws_s3_bucket" "bucket" { ... }. The current definition is a syntax error and will prevent Terraform from parsing the configuration.
2. For improved security, it is highly recommended to add an aws_s3_bucket_public_access_block resource to explicitly configure and block all public access to the S3 bucket.

[infrabaseai]

Potential issues found:

1. The aws_s3_bucket resource definition is missing its local name. Based on references in other resources (aws_s3_bucket.bucket.id), it was likely intended to be resource "aws_s3_bucket" "bucket" { ... }. The current definition is a syntax error and will prevent Terraform from parsing the configuration.
2. For improved security, it is highly recommended to add an aws_s3_bucket_public_access_block resource to explicitly configure and block all public access to the S3 bucket.

[infrabaseai]

You've used all your 10 complimentary code reviews for this cycle. Please upgrade to the Pro plan in your settings to continue receiving AI-powered code reviews.

[infrabaseai]

Potential issues found:

1. The aws_s3_bucket resource declaration is missing its required local name. This will cause a Terraform parsing error. Based on references in other resources (e.g., aws_s3_bucket.bucket.id), the intended declaration was likely resource "aws_s3_bucket" "bucket" { ... }.

[infrabaseai]

Potential issues found:

1. The aws_s3_bucket resource definition is missing a required name (e.g., "bucket"). This causes a syntax error and breaks references like aws_s3_bucket.bucket.id.
2. The aws_s3_bucket resource is missing the acl = "private" argument, violating the S3 public access rule.
3. The S3 bucket lacks an aws_s3_bucket_public_access_block resource configured with block_public_acls = true and block_public_policy = true as required by the S3 public access rule.
4. Raw AWS S3 resources (aws_s3_bucket, aws_s3_bucket_versioning, aws_s3_bucket_server_side_encryption_configuration) are used; prefer using an internal module for S3 buckets if one is available.

[infrabaseai]

Potential issues found:

1. The aws_s3_bucket resource is missing the acl = "private" argument. It also lacks configurations for block_public_acls = true and block_public_policy = true, which are typically set via an aws_s3_bucket_public_access_block resource.
2. Raw S3 resources (aws_s3_bucket, aws_s3_bucket_versioning, aws_s3_bucket_server_side_encryption_configuration) are defined. Consider using a module for these resources if an organizational standard or internal module exists.

[infrabaseai]

You've used all your 10 complimentary code reviews for this cycle. Please upgrade to the Pro plan in your settings to continue receiving AI-powered code reviews.

[infrabaseai]

Potential issues found:

1. S3 Bucket Does Not Block Public Access (error)
   File: another/main.tf at line 1
   The S3 bucket is missing explicit configurations to block public access. It should have block_public_acls = true, block_public_policy = true, ignore_public_acls = true, and restrict_public_buckets = true set within an aws_s3_bucket_public_access_block resource, or directly on the aws_s3_bucket resource if using a newer provider version. Additionally, the acl argument on the aws_s3_bucket resource is not set to "private".
   💡 Recommendation: Add an aws_s3_bucket_public_access_block resource associated with this bucket, and set block_public_acls = true, block_public_policy = true, ignore_public_acls = true, and restrict_public_buckets = true. Also, set acl = "private" on the aws_s3_bucket resource. For example:

resource "aws_s3_bucket" "this" {
bucket = "${var.project_name}-${var.environment}-bucket"
acl = "private"
tags = local.common_tags
}

resource "aws_s3_bucket_public_access_block" "this" {
bucket = aws_s3_bucket.this.id

block_public_acls = true
block_public_policy = true
ignore_public_acls = true
restrict_public_buckets = true
}

2. Raw S3 Resources Used Instead of Module (warning)
   File: another/main.tf at line 1
   The S3 bucket and its related configurations (versioning, server-side encryption) are defined as raw resources. According to the provided guidelines, resources should be defined as modules whenever possible. There might be an internal module for creating S3 buckets.
   💡 Recommendation: Refactor the S3 bucket creation to use an existing internal module if one is available for S3 buckets. This promotes consistency and reusability. If no such module exists, consider creating one.

3. Inconsistent Resource Naming Convention for S3 Bucket (note)
   File: another/main.tf at line 1
   The aws_s3_bucket resource is named with an implicit this (e.g., aws_s3_bucket.bucket.id). While not incorrect, using aws_s3_bucket.this.id is a common convention when there's a primary resource of that type in the module, which is then referenced by other supporting resources like aws_s3_bucket_versioning and aws_s3_bucket_server_side_encryption_configuration (which are correctly named this).
   💡 Recommendation: Rename the aws_s3_bucket resource from aws_s3_bucket to aws_s3_bucket.this for consistency with the naming of its associated resources. Update references in aws_s3_bucket_versioning.this and aws_s3_bucket_server_side_encryption_configuration.this from aws_s3_bucket.bucket.id to aws_s3_bucket.this.id.

[github-advanced-security]

This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation.

[infrabaseai]

🛡️ Security Analysis Results

Found 3 security issues:

Severity	Issue	File	Line	Recommendation
🔴 Critical	S3 Bucket Does Not Block Public Access	another/main.tf:1	1	Add an aws_s3_bucket_public_access_block resource assoc...
🟡 Warning	Raw S3 Resources Used Instead of Module	another/main.tf:1	1	Refactor the S3 bucket creation to use an existing intern...
⚪ Note	Inconsistent Resource Naming Convention for S3 ...	another/main.tf:1	1	Rename the aws_s3_bucket resource from aws_s3_bucket ...

📋 Detailed Descriptions

🔴 S3 Bucket Does Not Block Public Access

File: another/main.tf (Line 1)

Description: The S3 bucket is missing explicit configurations to block public access. It should have block_public_acls = true, block_public_policy = true, ignore_public_acls = true, and restrict_public_buckets = true set within an aws_s3_bucket_public_access_block resource, or directly on the aws_s3_bucket resource if using a newer provider version. Additionally, the acl argument on the aws_s3_bucket resource is not set to "private".

💡 Recommendation: Add an aws_s3_bucket_public_access_block resource associated with this bucket, and set block_public_acls = true, block_public_policy = true, ignore_public_acls = true, and restrict_public_buckets = true. Also, set acl = "private" on the aws_s3_bucket resource. For example:

resource "aws_s3_bucket" "this" {
bucket = "${var.project_name}-${var.environment}-bucket"
acl = "private"
tags = local.common_tags
}

resource "aws_s3_bucket_public_access_block" "this" {
bucket = aws_s3_bucket.this.id

block_public_acls = true
block_public_policy = true
ignore_public_acls = true
restrict_public_buckets = true
}

---

🟡 Raw S3 Resources Used Instead of Module

File: another/main.tf (Line 1)

Description: The S3 bucket and its related configurations (versioning, server-side encryption) are defined as raw resources. According to the provided guidelines, resources should be defined as modules whenever possible. There might be an internal module for creating S3 buckets.

💡 Recommendation: Refactor the S3 bucket creation to use an existing internal module if one is available for S3 buckets. This promotes consistency and reusability. If no such module exists, consider creating one.

---

⚪ Inconsistent Resource Naming Convention for S3 Bucket

File: another/main.tf (Line 1)

Description: The aws_s3_bucket resource is named with an implicit this (e.g., aws_s3_bucket.bucket.id). While not incorrect, using aws_s3_bucket.this.id is a common convention when there's a primary resource of that type in the module, which is then referenced by other supporting resources like aws_s3_bucket_versioning and aws_s3_bucket_server_side_encryption_configuration (which are correctly named this).

💡 Recommendation: Rename the aws_s3_bucket resource from aws_s3_bucket to aws_s3_bucket.this for consistency with the naming of its associated resources. Update references in aws_s3_bucket_versioning.this and aws_s3_bucket_server_side_encryption_configuration.this from aws_s3_bucket.bucket.id to aws_s3_bucket.this.id.

📊 Summary

• 🔴 Critical: 1
• 🟡 Warning: 1
• ⚪ Note: 1

---

🤖 Analysis powered by Infrabase AI

[try-terracotta]

Terracotta detected changes in your Terraform files. Running an initial plan and review of your changes – please hold on for a moment while we process your request.

🔍 Need help? View the Getting Started Guide

[try-terracotta]

In order to run a Terraform/CDK plan, a backend credential is required for this repository. Please add the appropriate credentials in the Terracotta app.

🔍 Need help? View How to Add Credentials

[try-terracotta]

# Terraform Code Review

### What’s Wrong?

1. **S3 Bucket Resource Naming and Referencing**  
   The `aws_s3_bucket` resource is declared without a name identifier, which is invalid Terraform syntax. Every resource must have a type and a resource name, e.g., `resource "aws_s3_bucket" "bucket" {}`.

2. **Dependencies and Referencing**  
   The `aws_s3_bucket_versioning` and `aws_s3_bucket_server_side_encryption_configuration` resources refer to `aws_s3_bucket.bucket.id`, but since the `aws_s3_bucket` is unnamed, the reference will fail.

3. **Bucket Public Access and Security Settings**  
   There is no configuration to explicitly block public access to the S3 bucket. Although encryption and versioning are enabled (good practices), the absence of public access block configuration or bucket ACL restricts potential misconfigurations that risk public exposure.

4. **Tagging and Variable Usage**  
   The bucket name uses interpolation with `var.project_name` and `var.environment`; ensure the variables are properly declared elsewhere. Also, using `${}` syntax is deprecated in Terraform 0.12+ and should be replaced with direct interpolation.

5. **Formatting and Code Hygiene**  
   The resource block style is valid but could improve with explicit resource naming, consistent indentation, and using updated Terraform interpolation syntax for better readability.

---

### Recommended Fix

Use the following configuration to provision the S3 bucket with correct resource names, secure default settings including public access block, versioning, and server-side encryption configured according to best practices.

```hcl
resource "aws_s3_bucket" "bucket" {
  bucket = "${var.project_name}-${var.environment}-bucket"
  tags   = local.common_tags

  # Enforce private ACL to avoid public access by default
  acl = "private"
}

resource "aws_s3_bucket_versioning" "bucket_versioning" {
  bucket = aws_s3_bucket.bucket.id

  versioning_configuration {
    status = "Enabled"
  }
}

resource "aws_s3_bucket_server_side_encryption_configuration" "bucket_encryption" {
  bucket = aws_s3_bucket.bucket.id

  rule {
    apply_server_side_encryption_by_default {
      sse_algorithm = "AES256"
    }
  }
}

resource "aws_s3_bucket_public_access_block" "bucket_block" {
  bucket = aws_s3_bucket.bucket.id

  block_public_acls       = true
  block_public_policy     = true
  ignore_public_acls      = true
  restrict_public_buckets = true
}

Additional notes:

• Replace deprecated interpolation syntax with Terraform 0.12+ native style:
  bucket = "${var.project_name}-${var.environment}-bucket"
  can be written as
  bucket = "${var.project_name}-${var.environment}-bucket" is acceptable but can be improved to:
  bucket = "${var.project_name}-${var.environment}-bucket" → bucket = "${var.project_name}-${var.environment}-bucket"
  (Terraform still supports this, but best practice is to use "${var.project_name}-${var.environment}-bucket" directly; keep as is if used consistently.)

• Confirm var.project_name, var.environment, and local.common_tags are properly defined in variables and locals.

---

Diff

+ resource "aws_s3_bucket" "bucket" {
+   bucket = "${var.project_name}-${var.environment}-bucket"
+   tags   = local.common_tags
+   acl    = "private"
+ }
+ 
+ resource "aws_s3_bucket_versioning" "bucket_versioning" {
+   bucket = aws_s3_bucket.bucket.id
+
+   versioning_configuration {
+     status = "Enabled"
+   }
+ }
+
+ resource "aws_s3_bucket_server_side_encryption_configuration" "bucket_encryption" {
+   bucket = aws_s3_bucket.bucket.id
+
+   rule {
+     apply_server_side_encryption_by_default {
+       sse_algorithm = "AES256"
+     }
+   }
+ }
+
+ resource "aws_s3_bucket_public_access_block" "bucket_block" {
+   bucket = aws_s3_bucket.bucket.id
+
+   block_public_acls       = true
+   block_public_policy     = true
+   ignore_public_acls      = true
+   restrict_public_buckets = true
+ }

---

Summary

This review ensures the S3 bucket resource declaration is valid by adding a resource name (bucket). It enforces strong security posture by implementing a aws_s3_bucket_public_access_block with all public access blocked, alongside keeping versioning and AES256 encryption enabled. The bucket ACL is explicitly set to private to avoid public exposure due to default ACLs. These practices minimize risk of accidental data exposure and align with AWS security best practices. Finally, the references among resources are fixed for correctness.

Integrate the recommended configuration to maintain strong security and Terraform best practices in your S3 bucket provisioning.