Skip to content

[11.0 P7] Update experimental status - #37434

Merged
guardrex merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
dev/ygerges/blazor-mev-experimental
Aug 11, 2026
Merged

[11.0 P7] Update experimental status#37434
guardrex merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
dev/ygerges/blazor-mev-experimental

Conversation

@Youssef1313

@Youssef1313 Youssef1313 commented Aug 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@Youssef1313
Youssef1313 requested a review from guardrex as a code owner August 7, 2026 08:31
@Youssef1313
Youssef1313 requested a review from oroztocil August 7, 2026 08:31
@guardrex guardrex changed the title Update Blazor form validation for MEV experimental status in 11 [11.0 P7] Update Blazor form validation for MEV experimental status in 11 Aug 7, 2026
@guardrex guardrex changed the title [11.0 P7] Update Blazor form validation for MEV experimental status in 11 [11.0 P7] Update experimental status Aug 7, 2026
@guardrex

guardrex commented Aug 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Thanks @Youssef1313 ... The text should change as well. The language can drop the "experimental" remarks in a couple of spots in that 10.0 section.

@guardrex guardrex self-assigned this Aug 7, 2026
@Youssef1313

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@guardrex The API was experimental in .NET 10, which is way I kept the exact same wording for .NET 10.

Is it a general recommendation that we drop experimental wording from documentation of older version but the API is stabilized in future version? We will still have to keep the info about suppressing the experimental warning etc, which plays nicely when we state that the API is experimental in .NET 10.

@guardrex

This comment was marked as outdated.

@guardrex guardrex left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Youssef1313 ... Just in case this appears for a dev who is unaware that they're looking at the .NET 10 version of the article, I recommend some tweaks to the language. See if my suggestions make sense here or write something that you think would indicate the same guidance.

WRT the versioning, it's fine the way that you have it.

Comment thread aspnetcore/blazor/forms/validation.md Outdated
Comment thread aspnetcore/blazor/forms/validation.md Outdated
Co-authored-by: Luke Latham <1622880+guardrex@users.noreply.github.com>

@guardrex guardrex left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, @Youssef1313! 🎷

@guardrex
guardrex merged commit 6c9a255 into main Aug 11, 2026
5 checks passed
@guardrex
guardrex deleted the dev/ygerges/blazor-mev-experimental branch August 11, 2026 14:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants