Skip to content

When a Url property is valid #7456

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

yecril71pl
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

I explain when a Url property is valid. The algorithm used to assess this is very inappropriate and unsatisfactory but that is another story. The previous definition was circular.

The previous definition was circular.  Note that I strongly disagree with the validation method.
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Dec 4, 2021

Tagging subscribers to this area: @ajcvickers
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Summary

I explain when a Url property is valid. The algorithm used to assess this is very inappropriate and unsatisfactory but that is another story. The previous definition was circular.

Author: yecril71pl
Assignees: -
Labels:

area-System.ComponentModel.DataAnnotations

Milestone: -

@opbld31
Copy link

opbld31 commented Dec 4, 2021

Docs Build status updates of commit a636777:

✅ Validation status: passed

File Status Preview URL Details
xml/System.ComponentModel.DataAnnotations/UrlAttribute.xml ✅Succeeded View

For more details, please refer to the build report.

Note: Broken links written as relative paths are included in the above build report. For broken links written as absolute paths or external URLs, see the broken link report.

For any questions, please:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants